Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barbara Crane

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Barbara Crane

  • Postcode verified

    PE4 6EX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings31w0
  • What needs to improve73w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
103
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 80%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms M James Acting Headteacher Caverstede Early Years Centre Caverstede Road Paston Peterborough PE4 6EX

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 10 March 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: observations of sessions, discussions with children and parents or carers, discussions with staff from the centre and those from partner agencies and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 All staff share the centre’s vision to fully include children in their learning and put this into practice. The strategic planning, processes and structures of the centre are closely focused on enabling children to make a positive contribution to the community. Responding to children’s ideas, views and preferences is central to the centre’s daily work.  Staff carry out close observations of children’s patterns of behaviour and act upon their findings to boost children’s learning. They listen to children’s voice and support them in expressing their theories about life, helping them to communicate, represent and divulge their preferences. This enables children to be confident contributors to what happens each day.  Individual planning for each child is built up from information gained from observations and what children tell the adults. The staff are skilled at giving children the time and space to make choices and trust them to make decisions.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Consequently, children are active participants in shaping their learning. Adults understand the need to react spontaneously and extend children’s learning in meaningful ways that follow children’s interests.  Resources are readily available to children so that they become autonomous and independent in selecting these to support their ideas for play.  The staff forge strong links with parents and give good guidance on how they can support children’s learning. Each child’s record of achievement is shared with parents so that they can contribute to future planning. Parents’ views are sought effectively and used to improve provision, for example in providing a fortnightly ‘Dads’ Club’ on Saturday mornings as well as a wide range of family workshops. Parents’ views are also gathered about particular interests that children demonstrate at home, so that these can be built into learning activities at the centre.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The centre’s close liaison with a wide range of outside agencies and health professionals enables a rapid response to the needs of the most vulnerable children and their families.

p.2

Areas for development

 Record more consistently the outcomes of children’s talk about their learning and use their views to inform the next steps.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the centre.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion