Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Barbara Crane

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Barbara Crane

  • Postcode verified

    HP2 4HS

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • What needs to improve66w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
97
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 80%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs R Harris-Cooksley Headteacher Dacorum Education Support Centre 30 Tenzing Road Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire HP2 4HS

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 3 March 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: observations of sessions, discussions with students and parents or carers, discussions with staff from the centre and those from partner schools, and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The clear vision for consultation with students, and using their views to bring about change, is very well represented in the centre’s strategic planning. The frequent review of how well the centre is achieving its aim of engaging students is part of its everyday processes.  Effective links and the two-way flow of information with parents and carers support the staff’s understanding of the students’ needs.  The centre captures students’ views about what constitutes barriers to their learning through a wide range of strategies. Individual mentoring support is sharply tailored to meet every student’s different needs. Adults are highly skilled listeners and support students’ capacity to air their views, opinions and concerns. Outside agencies, extra support or resources are accessed quickly where necessary.  The centre uses a wide range of effective strategies to gather students’ views. Pen portraits, completed by students, set out what each student wants the staff

p.1

Features of good practice observed

to know about them, what they find difficult, what the staff can do to help them and what students intend to do to help themselves.  Students are partners with staff in decisions about targets for learning and personal and social development. Frequent review meetings with staff give them valuable opportunities to assess their progress towards these targets. Information gained informs staff on how they can best personalise learning for students. Students’ aspirations rise in line with their self-esteem as they evaluate their successes.  The centre’s work in supporting partner schools has had a positive impact on reducing the rate of permanent exclusions. Preventative and outreach work has listening to students’ voices as its cornerstone. The staff from the centre have provided effective training for staff in other schools to boost their ability to listen to students and find ways of managing challenging behaviour and attitudes.

p.2

Areas for development

 Extend students’ role in contributing their voice to the centre’s strategic development planning.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the centre.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion