Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    L21 7LX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenthighly effectiveexceptionallyimprovedvery wellenthusiasmeffectively
Criticismweakbelowerrorsmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings631w+77
  • Leadership176w+85
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
867
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs P O’Brien Headteacher English Martyrs Catholic Primary School School Lane Litherland Liverpool Merseyside L21 7LX

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 18 March 2009 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons and four parts of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is outstanding and standards are exceptionally high.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 According to the school’s records, children enter the nursery with mathematical development below that expected for their age. Their calculation skills are particularly weak. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. By the end of Reception, their attainment in number and shape is broadly in line with that expected for their age. Their calculation skills have improved but are still below those expected for children aged five years.  Pupils achieve well in Key Stage 1 and by the end of Year 2, standards are above average. There has been a rising trend in recent years.  Pupils’ achievement in Key Stage 2 is outstanding. By the end of Year 6, standards have been exceptionally high for the past four years.  Pupils’ achievement and standards in calculation, shape, space and measures, and data handling are equally high. Their achievement in using and applying mathematics, investigating and solving problems is good but not quite as high as

p.1

Achievement and standards

in other areas. The school is working successfully to close this gap.  High quality additional activities, such as cross-curricular mathematics topics and homework assignments, support groups and parental involvement, make a vital contribution to pupils’ high achievement.  The achievement of boys, girls, gifted and talented pupils and those who require additional support is equally good because their diverse needs are fully met.  Pupils display excellent attitudes to learning and enjoy mathematics immensely. They relish challenges and work diligently, both independently and collaboratively, on mathematical assignments.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is good with outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Excellent use is made of information and communication technology (ICT) to help pupils to understand complex ideas, improve their skills and solve problems.  Teachers use mathematical equipment imaginatively and provide stimulating activities that are very well matched to pupils’ different learning needs. These approaches ignite pupils’ enthusiasm and promote high achievement.  Teachers use assessments very effectively to identify pupils’ learning needs and set challenging and meaningful targets to help them to achieve their goals. Although errors in pupils’ work are identified and corrected, pointers for improvement are sometimes omitted when their work is marked.  Teachers are effective in developing pupils’ conceptual understanding by providing first-hand learning experiences and anticipating likely misconceptions. Just occasionally, as the lesson progresses, opportunities are missed to check

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

pupils’ understanding to ensure that they are fully prepared for the next activity.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 The school has now designed a highly effective curriculum, which fully reflects pupils’ needs and interests and includes all of the components of the revised framework. As a result, pupils have excellent opportunities to develop calculation, investigation and problem-solving skills in real-life contexts.  The use of ICT as a tool for learning mathematics is extremely well established.  Curriculum planning is dynamic. Topics are carefully evaluated and modified in the light of pupils’ enjoyment, confidence and success in learning.  The needs of pupils of high ability, those who require additional support and pupils whose performance has faltered are particularly well catered for through intervention and personalised learning programmes.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are outstanding.  Your contribution as headteacher has been significant in setting high expectations of pupils and staff, raising achievement and ensuring that pupils’ learning of mathematics is meaningful, purposeful and enjoyable.  The subject leader’s deep knowledge of mathematics and attention to detail in working with staff to evaluate what works and where improvements could be made, has ensured that high standards have been maintained.  Checking of the work of the school is meticulous and rigorous. The information is used very effectively in future planning. The process constantly refreshes teachers’ and pupils’ enthusiasm for the subject.  Analysing assessments and tracking pupils’ progress are highly effective tools for improvement. The school’s data indicated that standards in Years 2 and 6 would not be as high in 2009 as in previous years because of the higher incidence of

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

pupils with learning difficulties. In response, much additional support is being provided for particular pupils, and with some success. The school has already adjusted its targets to reflect the improved attainment.

p.3

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 The school possesses considerable expertise in mathematics and ICT. This is systematically and regularly shared to promote good practice.  Staff training is highly effective because those who provide it work in school and are able to measure its impact.  The school has designed a useful proforma for observing lessons but there is scope to increase the focus on how well teachers evaluate and promote pupils’ conceptual understanding.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 teachers adding pointers for improvement when they mark pupils’ work  ensuring that pupils’ understanding is checked as the lesson unfolds to ensure that they are fully prepared for the follow-up activities.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion