Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Bain

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Bain

  • Postcode verified

    CM2 6WN

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+69Positivemore positive than 68% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveengagingeffectivelysuccessfuleffectiveclearly
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
480
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Chris Kirk ACL Strategic Manager - Family Learning Adult and Community Learning Essex County Council PO Box 47 County Hall Chelmsford Essex, CM2 6WN

p.1

and communities

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on the 12 th of February 2009. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

and communities

The visit provided much useful evidence, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting for the family learning survey. I was especially pleased to see the early years/foundation session in Northwick Park Children’s Centre. Parents showed good development of skills and understanding in communicating with their children and engaging them in a range of creative activities. Outcomes for parents and children were clearly articulated and achieved. Parents effectively supported their children to develop fine and gross motor skills and early learning concepts such as colour, shape and position. I was also interested to see the pilot arrangements to record children’s attendance and progress.

p.1

and communities

The evidence used to inform the judgements made on this one day visit included: interviews with staff, partners and learners; scrutiny of the examples of good practice provided including a visit to a family learning activity. A range of documents, case studies and data were reviewed. Susan Bain HMI Ofsted North Region 3 rd Floor, Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester M2 7LA T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk TELEPHONE: 0114 288 0985 MOBILE: 0776 483 8721 EMAIL: susan.bain@ofsted.gov.uk Overall, the family learning provision I sampled during my one-day visit at Essex County Council is good. I agreed to provide a summary of the good practice seen and to identify some areas for development, and I outline the main findings as bulleted points below.

p.1

The main strengths are:

 Good development of parenting and learning skills  High retention and achievement of learning goals at well over 90%  Very effective teaching that models successful ways to support children’s learning and development  Responsive and flexible provision to meet the needs of targeted groups  Good partnership working to support recruitment and programme delivery

p.2

Areas for further development

 More effective use of individual learning plans to record personalised learning  The continued work to engage a higher proportion of men  The development of impact measures to monitor progress and progression for children and adults

p.2

Areas for further development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your Family Learning provision. If there are any points or aspects of the visit you wish to discuss, please contact me. As we will be evaluating the survey, you may be contacted in the future to find out your views. I hope you will contribute to this evaluation.

p.2

Areas for further development

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted Website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion