Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Bain

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Bain

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveenjoymentstrengths
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
433
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Michaela Salmon Skills for Life Senior Curriculum Manager Manchester City Council

p.1

and communities

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on the 19th November 2008. I am particularly grateful to you, all your staff and learners for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

and communities

The visit provided much useful evidence, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting for the family learning survey. I was particularly pleased to meet learners at Woodhouse Park Surestart Children’s Centre and St Mary’s CE Primary School, and to hear from them how family learning had helped them:  become more self aware  promote positive family relationships  improve their children’s confidence, and enjoyment of learning

p.1

and communities

The evidence used to inform the judgements made on this one-day visit included: interviews with staff, learners and observations of family learning sessions. I also reviewed a range of documentation, case studies and reports. No recent data was available.

p.1

and communities

The family learning provision sampled during my one-day visit at Manchester City Council is good. I agreed to provide a summary of the good practice seen and to Susan Bain HMI Ofsted North Region 3 rd Floor, Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester M2 7LA T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk TELEPHONE: 0114 288 0985 MOBILE: 0776 483 8721 EMAIL: susan.bain@ofsted.gov.uk identify some areas for development, and I outline the main findings as bulleted points below.

p.1

and communities

The main strengths are:  Good development of personal, learning and parenting skills  Good progression, particularly into further learning opportunities  Effective teaching and learning strategies that promote the application of learning with families in the home  Wide ranging and effective partnerships that support the recruitment and retention of ‘hard to reach’ learners  Good development of strategic links to promote coherent action with other agencies Areas for further development  The extension of family learning provision beyond primary school, to support transitions into and during secondary education  The development of measures to recognise the impact of family learning on children’s progress and achievement

p.2

and communities

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your Family Learning provision. If there are any points or aspects of the visit you wish to discuss, please contact me. As we will be evaluating the survey, you may be contacted in the future to find out your views. I hope you will contribute to this evaluation.

p.2

and communities

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted Website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion