Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Bain

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Bain

  • Postcode verified

    WF2 7DQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 65% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedgood progressstrongeffectivelystrengthspositiveeffective
Criticismbelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
476
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Anne-Marie Spencer Skills for Families Consultant Wakefield MDC Manygates Education centre HQ Manygates Lane Sandal Wakefield WF2 7DQ 4 December 2008

p.1

and communities

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on the 3rd December 2008. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

and communities

The visit provided much useful evidence, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting for the family learning survey. It was particularly interesting to see the joint family literacy session at Three Lane Ends Primary School, where parents were working very effectively to support their children’s learning. I was also interested in the work you have carried out to evaluate the impact of family learning on the progress and attainment of participating children.

p.1

and communities

The evidence used to inform the judgements made on this one-day visit included: interviews with staff, partners and learners; scrutiny of the examples of good practice provided including a visit to family learning activities. A range of documents and data was reviewed.

p.1

and communities

Overall, the family learning provision I sampled during my one-day visit at Wakefield MDC is good. I agreed to provide a summary of the good practice seen and to identify some areas for development, and I outline the main findings as bulleted points below. Susan Bain HMI Ofsted North Region 3 rd Floor, Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann’s Square Manchester M2 7LA T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk TELEPHONE: 0114 288 0985 MOBILE: 0776 483 8721 EMAIL: susan.bain@ofsted.gov.uk The main strengths are:  Many examples of positive outcomes for parents/ carers and children evidenced, for example, in good qualification success rates of 86%, progression into other learning and work, improved confidence and the good progress in children’s learning.  Good teaching strategies that equip parents and carers understand how and what children learn, and gives them effective skills to use at home  Good partnership working that directly supports work with learners and

p.1

and communities

promotes improved coherence, at strategic level, in planning and intervention  Particularly strong focus on monitoring, evaluation and continuous improvement, that provides much evidence about the impact of family learning

p.2

and communities

Areas for further development  Improvements to the low recruitment of men  The extension of provision beyond the primary stage of learning

p.2

and communities

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your Family Learning provision. If there are any points or aspects of the visit you wish to discuss, please contact me. As we will be evaluating the survey, you may be contacted in the future to find out your views. I hope you will contribute to this evaluation.

p.2

and communities

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted Website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion