Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    MONITORING VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependentimprovedeffective
Criticisminsufficientnot sufficientlytoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,110
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Context

Oakwood Court College is an independent residential specialist college, which is part of Education and Care (Devon) Ltd., a company founded by the former principal, who is now the Chief Executive. The college was opened in 1998 at its present site, and is based in the seaside town of Dawlish in Devon. In 2000, a further residence, Fairfield House along with Fairfield Cottage, was opened and the college now operates on the two sites, situated approximately two miles apart. A further 6 bedded residential unit is situated in walking distance of the main site at 1 Oak Park Villas. The company also provides residential and supported living care services within the locality. The college aims to meet the needs of young people, aged 16 to 25, with moderate and severe learning difficulties who may also have associated complex needs. These include challenging behaviours, autistic spectrum disorders and speech and language difficulties. Following the retirement of

p.1

Context

the previous principal in July 2007 a new principal was appointed in January 2008.

p.1

progress

Achievements are good. All except one learner had achieved both internally and externally accredited awards. One learner had achieved internally accredited awards only. The range of awards achieved is extensive. Internal accreditation covers practical life skills such as cooking and cycling as well as skills such as digital photography, Tae Kwon Do, music and information technology (IT). External accreditation covers qualifications in, for example, IT, Duke of Edinburgh Awards, digital photography and awards for volunteering.

p.1

progress

The college has made reasonable progress in developing the transition arrangements for learners. Eight learners left the college in July 2007, all of whom are in either voluntary unpaid employment or are attending further education colleges. All are living in appropriate accommodation suitable to their individual needs. The transition arrangements have been further improved this year. A new role of transition facilitator was created and a post holder has been in place since October 2007. Transition plans are in place and are fully supported by a development plan. All learners who are due to leave in 2008 have detailed action plans. It is, though, too early to fully judge the impact of the new processes.

p.2

progress

The college has introduced a new management information system which has been in place since November 2007. Much information has been put onto the new system. However, information which will enable the college to have full oversight of learners’ overall progress will not be on the system until September 2008. It is therefore too early to judge the impact of the new system.

p.2

progress

Each work-skill area has started to recognise which specific literacy, numeracy and communication skills they need for their particular environment. All staff have been supported to do this by the skills for life co- ordinator. Revised schemes of work are in the process of being developed. The speech and language therapist has identified key communication skills needed within different work placements. All staff have had training on understanding skills for life and how to embed them within their sessions. All curriculum areas set relevant literacy, numeracy and communication targets for the learners to work on. However, this has led to too many targets being set for each learner. The college recognises this and is currently streamlining the process. The system for recording progress against targets at subject level is effective but the method used is lengthy and overly complex. The college is addressing this issue through the introduction of the new

p.2

progress

management information system. Currently there is insufficient analysis of literacy, numeracy and communication targets.

p.3

progress

Reasonable progress has been made with developing skills and setting targets within the extended curriculum. Targets are set for daily living skills, community and leisure, and personal care. They are personalised and negotiated between the learner, key worker and tutor. The targets are real and meaningful and help to develop independent skills. The staff have received training in how to set targets. The extended curriculum co- coordinator is responsible for monitoring the achievement of the targets. At present, literacy, numeracy and communication targets are not used in the extended curriculum. The college has identified this as an area that they wish to develop.

p.3

progress

The college has made reasonable progress in identifying and recording how specific interventions are being implemented by teaching and support staff. Individual learner needs are assessed and identified. In addition all learners receive a dyslexia assessment. Outcomes lead to strategies that are communicated to all staff through meetings and the individual learning support programme. Resources are adapted and deployed accordingly. The interventions are monitored through regular meetings and through the skills for life lesson observations in the autumn term. However, the interventions are not routinely observed in the newly introduced teaching and learning observation reports. The personal, social and support co-coordinator is responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of specific interventions, but the college recognises that it needs to formalise their approach to monitoring. All staff have received specialised dyslexic training.

p.3

progress

Every learner has had their learning style identified. Lesson activities are adapted accordingly to accommodate different learning styles. All tutors are encouraged to use a multi-sensory approach to teaching and learning.

p.4

progress

The last monitoring visit identified that the college does not produce a plan to show how it will address teaching and learning issues identified as a result of its observations. At the time of this monitoring visit the college had still not fully addressed this issue. A large number of literacy and numeracy lessons were observed between September and December 2007 and issues identified in the observations were addressed individually with the appropriate teachers. A new observation of teaching and learning report was introduced in January 2008 and has been used to complete a small number of observations. The new report is very complex and does not sufficiently focus on the learners’ experiences. There is very little information about the actual content of the lesson so it is difficult to know what the learners are doing in the lesson and whether they are working at an appropriate level and are fully engaged in

p.4

progress

learning. Each aspect of the lesson is graded by a percentage score and the information is used to determine an overall grade. It is difficult to judge the accuracy of the grading of the observations as the form is complex and no overall picture emerges from the information. There are plans to use the information from the observations to help inform continuing professional development for staff, but at the time of the inspection the plans had not been implemented.

p.4

progress

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion