Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Jun 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Rutherford

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Rutherford

  • Postcode verified

    M40 8PL

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
18
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Ms Cath Potter Headteacher St Augustine’s C of E Primary School St Augustine Street Monsall Manchester M40 8PL

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 3 June 2009, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please also pass on my thanks to the chair of governors and the school effectiveness officer for visiting the school to provide me with useful information.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 16-17 April 2008, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

 improve standards, especially in English and mathematics, to ensure that pupils make even better progress  improve the quality of teaching to make learning better and ensure that all pupils are challenged  improve attendance, especially among hard core absentees  develop the role of subject leaders to enable them to manage their subject areas effectively, support teachers professionally and improve the quality of provision.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making good progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

The results of the 2008 National Curriculum tests and assessments show that standards in English and mathematics improved considerably after the inspection and are broadly average. This represents good progress for pupils whose skills and knowledge were well below those typical for their age group when they started school. The school’s own data on pupils’ achievement show that the gains in 2008 have been sustained in 2009. Standards at the end of Key Stage 1 were exceptionally low in the 2008 National Curriculum tests and assessments, following a period of staffing turbulence. The school has responded strongly by providing CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 934 Direct F 01695 729 320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 intensive support in reading, writing and mathematics to all pupils in the year group. This has enabled the majority to make very rapid progress and the school’s unvalidated data for 2009 indicate a significant rise in standards. Pupils’ progress is consistently good in all classes. The large proportions of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities or who speak English as an additional language make good progress because of the effective support they receive. Higher attaining pupils are making much better progress than previously because they receive more challenge in lessons.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school’s strategies to reduce absence are effective. Overall attendance is now close to the national average. The proportion of pupils who are persistent absentees has significantly reduced since the inspection, although it is still above average.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Pupils make good progress in English and mathematics because the quality of teaching and learning in these subjects has improved. Teachers and teaching assistants match work to the needs of the pupils and engage them in interesting, enjoyable practical activities. They are helped in this because the school deploys its resources such that the pupils in all classes can be taught in small groups. Programmes of additional support are particularly effective in accelerating the progress of underachieving pupils. The school has very clear information about pupils’ achievement and teachers use this well for setting targets and planning work. The use of assessment in lessons to help pupils improve their progress is at an early stage of development.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The headteacher provides strong leadership and the contribution of leaders at senior and middle levels is developing well. The deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher demonstrate high quality teaching. They have a good understanding of the strengths and priorities for improvement in English and mathematics across the school and are beginning to have a strong positive influence on the work of their colleagues, although this is not yet systematic. Leaders of subjects other than English and mathematics have made considerable progress in developing their roles since the inspection. They have benefited from the many training opportunities provided by the school and are beginning to audit the quality of work in their subjects and to provide guidance to their colleagues. The governors provide good support based on a clear understanding of what the school needs in order to improve further. They also provide constructive challenge, particularly in respect of

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The local authority provides effective support, which it is reducing in recognition of the school’s good capacity to take the lead in improving teaching, learning and standards.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion