Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Ryan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Ryan

  • Postcode verified

    BA12 8AB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings31w0
  • What needs to improve75w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
105
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 79%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Clough Headteacher Crockerton CofE Primary School Potters Hill Crockerton Warminster Wiltshire BA12 8AB

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 12 March 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: observations of lessons and ‘constellation’ time, meetings with groups of children and the school council, meetings with staff and with parents.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s ethos, based around the six ‘Rs – responsible, reflective, respectful, resilient, resourceful, reciprocal’, is driven by the needs and voice of the learner. These principles underpin all learning and teaching, and are well understood by the pupils, staff and parents. Children are very secure in their environment, achieve well and are confident that their voice is heard.  Children are consulted routinely on many issues, for example through the ‘Dear Mrs Clough’ letter box, questionnaires, the school council, and whole school discussions. They say that their views are taken seriously and make a difference, for example on the new school uniform, the recently improved lunchtime arrangements, the appointment of staff and the evaluation of initiatives and developments.  The school makes excellent use of mediation and mentoring techniques, through the ‘constellation’ groups, to work with children and parents to

p.1

Features of good practice observed

resolve issues affecting friendships, relationships and transitions. Children display maturity and poise in talking about these complex issues.  Children take good responsibility for their learning through self and peer assessment, and setting personal and learning targets which are monitored and for which they take ownership. Individuals are well supported, for example through intervention and support programmes to reinforce and extend their learning. They are encouraged to take responsibility for identifying their own needs, for example through the selection of topics for additional support in the Key Stage 2 mathematics and literacy clinics.  All children are strongly encouraged to participate in the full range of enrichment activities and to take responsibility, for example as monitors in class and at lunchtime and as members of the school council.  The excellent partnership between the teaching staff, teaching assistants and

p.1

Features of good practice observed

children is tangible, and impacts very positively on children’s achievements. Very good use is made of external frameworks and training to develop staff and enhance provision.

p.2

Areas for development

 Review and re-energise the work of the school council, including the creation of more opportunities for children to take the lead.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion