Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    L31 3DZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • What needs to improve67w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
95
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 11%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 65%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr McLoughlin Headteacher Maricourt Catholic High School Hall Lane Maghull Liverpool Merseyside L31 3DZ

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: identifying good practice in personal, social,

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on to look at work in PSHEE.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: identifying good practice in personal, social,

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: identifying good practice in personal, social,

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students, observation of five lessons and scrutiny of subject documentation and students’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 PSHEE is well led and managed at both senior and middle management levels.  Teachers use a wide range of effective teaching strategies which give students good opportunities to research, discuss and debate a range of issues affecting their lives and the lives of others.  Work is well-matched to students’ social, emotional and intellectual maturity.  The quality of individual advice and guidance is outstanding.  Good liaison with partner and feeder primary schools ensures smooth and well supported transition in PSHEE.  The quality and accessibility of careers education and guidance is outstanding.

p.1

Areas for development

 sex and relationships education within PSHEE  meeting the requirements for the Healthy School Standard.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHEE in the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion