Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    NW5 1RL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentsuccessfullystrongeffectivelywell supportedimprovedpositivepromptly
Criticismat riskpersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings545w+70
  • What needs to improve227w−45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
755
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 48
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 29%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms S Higgins The Headteacher Parliament Hill School 140 Highgate Road Kentish Town London NW5 1RL

p.1

opportunity

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff during our visit on Wednesday 21 January 2009 to look at work promoting equality of opportunity.

p.1

opportunity

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

opportunity

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included meetings with:

p.1

opportunity

 yourself, the deputy-head teachers and the school’s lead behaviour practitioner  heads of Years 7, 11 and 12  the school’s Police Officer, Connexions Advisor and the Home-school Liaison Officers  parents  students

p.1

opportunity

In addition, brief observations were made of a number of lessons which included: Year 9 I.T., Year 10 Science, Year 9 PSHE/Citizenship, Year 11 English and a group of students on a Year 10 ‘Motivation and Support’ programme. A short review of school documentation was also carried out.

p.1

opportunity

The quality of provision to promote equalities is good.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school has successfully recruited a range of staff who reflect the social and ethnic background of their students and who work very successfully to gain the support and confidence of students and parents and support social cohesion in a diverse setting.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s Inclusion Panel provides an excellent and efficient system for identifying the wide range of vulnerable students at Parliament Hill, assessing their needs, implementing and subsequently monitoring support strategies. It is respected by all contributing professionals, internal and external to the school, who consider that their work and contributions are recognised and valued.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The school works well with a range of agencies to meet the different needs presented by vulnerable students and also works very effectively with a number of specialist external agencies to meet more specific and severe needs e.g. therapeutic drama and art specialists, counsellors and specialist advocate services such as Elfrida Rathbone.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The close work with feeder primary schools in Year 6 is particularly pro-active and thorough. This ensures that vulnerable students are identified early and that strategies are in place at transition stage. This results in high level awareness of individual needs by teaching staff who are able to track student progress and emotional well-being closely and intervene promptly when necessary.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The school has a very strong PSHE programme in place which has particular emphasis on issues which the school has identified as being particularly pertinent to its student community e.g. domestic violence, sexual exploitation, drug and alcohol abuse.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The ‘Motivation and Support’ programme is highly regarded by students who were at risk of school and social exclusion and who now feel well supported and better prepared to meet their personal challenges. This has resulted in significantly improved behaviour and attendance rates.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 The ‘Raising Aspirations’ programme has had a very positive impact on increasing levels of attainment and changing the attitudes and aspirations of students who were potential university candidates but who, prior to the programme had not considered it possible due to their personal circumstances and experiences.

p.2

Areas for development

 Continue to implement strategies to raise achievement of the vulnerable groups ‘at risk’ as identified in the School Development Plan.

p.3

Areas for development

 Further develop and widen the ‘Raising Aspirations’ programme to include: more specific support on subject choice for specific professions; and support for those who may wish to progress to employment and other higher level qualifications.

p.3

Areas for development

 Continue to address persistent absence and attendance issues.

p.3

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop promoting equalities in Parliament Hill secondary school.

p.3

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

Ofsted gathers information on the immediate and longer-term impact of survey inspections, both on the institutions themselves, and with a view to improving its own processes. To this end, I should be grateful if you would complete the attached questionnaire and return it within the next ten days. We have also just sent a copy of the questionnaire by email. Please return your completed questionnaire to either the email or postal address on the form, not to me. We may also contact some schools by telephone after several months in order for us to gain a picture of longer-term impact. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion