Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Specialist Adviser (lead), Leszek Iwaskow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Leszek Iwaskow, Specialist Adviser

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveenjoykeeneffectivelycleargapssensitive
Criticisminsufficientinadequatelimitedlacknot sufficientlytoo manynot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings551w−41
  • Leadership218w−39
  • What needs to improve115w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
856
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 March 2009 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a focus on how effectively geography teaching and the curriculum promotes community cohesion.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of six lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are both satisfactory overall and in line with national expectations.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils develop skills well. From an early age they are used to using atlases as well as a variety of maps. By the end of Year 6 pupils use these with confidence and their mapping skills are further honed Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Mr Thomson Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Dorset Road Somerford Christchurch Dorset BH23 3DA through frequent opportunities to use these practically, particularly through orienteering.  There are opportunities for pupils to develop fieldwork skills, particularly at Key Stage 2. Observation skills are best developed but there are less frequent opportunities to collect and analyse firsthand data.  Pupils have good recall of geographical vocabulary and are able to locate a variety of places and recognise geographical features. They have good spatial awareness.  Pupils are less secure in their more in-depth knowledge and understanding of places. In too many cases, they have only a superficial understanding of what a place is really like. They also have insufficient understanding of topical issues.  Pupils are generally responsive in class and keen to answer questions. Relationships with teachers and their peers are positive.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of geography

The quality of teaching and learning in geography is satisfactory overall.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of geography

 Teaching of geography is satisfactory with a clear focus on factual recall. Pupils have fewer opportunities to think geographically.  Teachers seen had good generic teaching skills but lacked the confidence and geographic expertise to teach the subject well.  The range of approaches used in teaching geography, other than geographical skills, limits opportunities for pupils to develop real geographical understanding. There are few opportunities for pupils to develop geographical enquiry.  Pupils enjoy working collaboratively, particularly when they engage in learning outside the classroom. Unfortunately, these experiences, though valuable, are not sufficiently structured to enable them to progressively develop a real understanding of geography in the world around them.  Pupils’ work is marked regularly but doesn’t inform pupils sufficiently how they can improve their learning in geography.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is currently inadequate.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school acknowledges that the curriculum is a ‘work in progress’ as it is currently developing a cross-curricular approach to the teaching of foundation subjects.  At present, there is an over emphasis on skills to the detriment of knowledge and understanding. As a result pupils’ progress in geography is fragmented.  Although most topics are covered, the opportunities to study a range of places in sufficient depth are limited.  There are also insufficient opportunities to study topical issues which can provide a real opportunity for pupils to understand the world around them and how these issues can impact on their own lives.  There are few opportunities at Key Stage 1 for pupils to use the local area to develop a good understanding of the characteristics of the physical and human world immediately around them.  At Key Stage 2, pupils complete fieldwork linked to their study of rivers while visiting Hengisbury Head as well as during their residential stay

p.2

Quality of curriculum

in the Swanage area. These opportunities are valued by the pupils but there are insufficient opportunities to utilise these experiences fully as part of their study of geography.

p.3

Leadership and management of geography

Leadership and management of geography are satisfactory overall.

p.3

Leadership and management of geography

 The newly appointed curriculum leader is aware of areas of the curriculum in need of development and is keen to improve provision in the subject.  Curriculum coverage is monitored but there is less evidence that the gaps and lack of progression in pupils’ work have been identified.  Resources are good for the teaching of geographical skills, especially map skills. However, resources for the in depth study of places are more limited.  Insufficient use has been made of the support, training and guidance provided by the subject associations to develop the curriculum and geographical learning.  There has been no programme of staff development to develop teacher expertise to enable them to teach the subject with confidence.

p.3

Subject issue

The effectiveness of geography teaching and the curriculum in promoting community cohesion is satisfactory.

p.3

Subject issue

 Pupils are aware of the wider world but lack the detail to understand it more deeply.  There are insufficient opportunities for pupils to learn about and debate topical, sensitive or controversial issues.  There are only limited links through the geography curriculum to enable pupils to develop an understanding that they live in a complex and diverse world.  Pupils enjoy working collaboratively and have a positive attitude to one another in geography lessons.

p.3

Areas for improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.4

Areas for improvement

 develop teacher confidence and expertise to enable them to teach geography more effectively and really engage and challenge pupils  develop a curriculum which builds on the good foundation of geographical skills to enable pupils to progress in their knowledge and understanding of places  explore possible international links through the curriculum to enhance the study of contrasting and diverse places and support community cohesion.

p.4

Areas for improvement

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion