Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
Specialist Adviser (lead), Leszek Iwaskow
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Leszek Iwaskow, Specialist Adviser
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When the work is well planned and there a clear structure which is clearly focused on the learning of geography, pupil outcomes are good. p.2
- Pupils develop their locational knowledge very well from their early experiences to when they leave the school. p.1
- At times it is outstanding but it can also be just satisfactory. p.2
- Teachers seen had good generic skills and some aspects of the lessons observed were good or outstanding. p.2
- Where the topics are well planned, and particularly through the units linked to ‘geography in the news’, pupils are being exposed to learning about a range of sensitive issues. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“Leadership and management of geography are satisfactory overall.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,238
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 25 February 2009 to look at work in geography.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a focus on how effectively geography teaching and the curriculum promotes community cohesion.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography
The overall effectiveness of geography is satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards are satisfactory overall and in line with national expectations.
p.1
Achievement and standards
At the end of Key Stage 1, pupils have a good idea of the range of different cultures. However, due to the topic approach they are unclear that geography is about the study of the world, places and people. Pupils develop their locational knowledge very well from their early experiences to when they leave the school. Pupils learn to use and draw maps regularly from an early age. They are familiar with atlases. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Achievement and standards
Mrs J Cook-Hannah Headteacher Holy Family Catholic Primary School Hall Lane Cronton Widnes WA8 5DW Pupils can name and locate a range of places and have a good knowledge of basic facts about a range of other countries. By Year 6 pupils have an improved understanding of what geography is about and they are able to use a range of geographical vocabulary accurately. The lack of clear progression in their learning prevents pupils from achieving better. When pupils are challenged and they study a topic in greater depth outcomes are often good or better. However, where the tasks set are superficial pupils made weaker progress. At present, learning is inconsistent and varies between topics. Better progress is made where pupils are able to learn in the outdoor environment. This is particularly noticeable in the work completed during their residential visit to the Lake District and in some of the more local studies.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils benefit from learning about topical issues and current affairs. They perceive these as being relevant to their lives. When they are enabled to do this they show a high level of understanding and a good perception of the issues. This was noticeably exemplified through their study of the conflict in the Middle East, notably in Gaza. Pupils enjoy geography and are keen to be involved in lessons especially when they are engaged with the topic. The behaviour of the overwhelming majority of pupils is good and they listen carefully to their peers and teachers.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of geography
The quality of teaching and learning in geography is currently inconsistent across topics. At times it is outstanding but it can also be just satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of geography
Teachers seen had good generic skills and some aspects of the lessons observed were good or outstanding. However, scrutiny of pupils’ work showed inconsistencies across the topics being taught. When the work is well planned and there a clear structure which is clearly focused on the learning of geography, pupil outcomes are good. Where tasks set lack challenge and are sometimes inappropriate this reflects insecurities teachers may have in teaching a subject for which they have had little training or support. Real learning occurs when pupils are stimulated by the tasks set and asked to develop their thinking. Superficial learning occurs when they are merely asked to accumulate information.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory. The geography curriculum has been evolving and improving over several years. There is a clear vision and structure which meets statutory requirements and ensures that children get exposure to the full range of topics. Some units of work are detailed and well planned and allow pupils to progressively develop geographical skills, knowledge and understanding. Elsewhere, the content may be geographical but there is a lack of structure or direction which does not support geographical learning. As a result, pupils’ development in geography is erratic and patchy. Where teachers are less secure in what is good geographical learning, geography often provides a context for learning in other subjects. In these cases pupils’ views of countries such as Spain or India are often cultural and lack real understanding of what the place is really like. The school is developing a good programme of fieldwork and visits to
p.2
Quality of curriculum
contrasting localities which provide real learning opportunities for the pupils and is commented on positively in how it brings their learning about places to life.
p.3
Leadership and management of geography
Leadership and management of geography are satisfactory overall.
p.3
Leadership and management of geography
The development and management of the subject is undergoing a period of transition and change. You, as headteacher, have taken temporary charge and have ensured that improvements have continued to be made to the structure of the evolving curriculum. This will be taken on by a colleague in the near future. The capacity to ensure the subject continues to improve is good. There is a comprehensive geography policy that has clear objectives and which identifies the main teaching and learning intentions and processes in each key stage. It also includes a clear rationale for planning and identifies the need to link learning with other subjects. The school is tracking the curriculum well. Currently, the focus is on guaranteeing coverage rather than ensuring the quality of the provision. Resources are adequate but the quality of these varies and better resources are clearly linked to the better planned units of work. Where
p.3
Leadership and management of geography
resources are good the subject is taught well. The school has had no access to quality subject specific advice which has meant it has been unaware of the support available through subject associations. As a result, teachers have had little subject specific training or support to enable them to build up their confidence and expertise in teaching the subject.
p.3
Subject issue
The effectiveness of geography teaching and the curriculum in promoting community cohesion is good.
p.4
Subject issue
One of the aims of the school’s geography curriculum is to foster a sense of global citizenship amongst the pupils. The school is doing this well, although this is not yet consistent across all topics Through a focus on a variety of places, both near and far, geography is being used to make pupils aware of the world around them and some of the issues which are impacting on their lives. Some of the coverage of topics such as fair-trade and poverty are beginning to open pupils’ minds to issue such as inequality and justice. Where the topics are well planned, and particularly through the units linked to ‘geography in the news’, pupils are being exposed to learning about a range of sensitive issues. Studies of the war in Afghanistan, the plight of refugees in the Congo and particularly the recent study of the conflict in Gaza have enabled older children to debate sensitive and real issues which have a relevance to their lives and future wellbeing.
p.4
Subject issue
Pupils are able to discuss the issues with conviction and show a real understanding of both sides of the argument.
p.4
Areas for improvement
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:
p.4
Areas for improvement
ensure that progression is planned into the curriculum through the teaching units in order to provide a clear pathway for pupils to develop their learning in geography utilise the expertise and support provided by the subject associations to provide teachers with relevant and suitable resources as well as training, where appropriate, to improve their confidence in teaching geography monitor the outcomes for pupils as well as the coverage to provide a clear idea where specific areas need to be improved with additional quality resources or approaches build on and utilise the wide range of outdoor experiences pupils’ receive to further enhance learning in geography. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for the next institutional inspection.
p.4
Areas for improvement
Leszek Iwaskow Her Majesty’s Inspector Specialist Adviser for Geography
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion