Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Anthony O’Malley
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 0
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- —
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- —
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Full report text
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 February 2009, to look at the impact of the National Strategies on raising standards and narrowing the attainment gap.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
As outlined in my initial letter, the visit focused on the work of the National Strategies in improving outcomes for children and young people. The visit focused particularly on the school’s view of the impact of the National Strategies and how this is evaluated.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual schools will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The evidence used to inform the outcomes of the visit included interviews with the headteacher and other senior staff. The inspector observed three part–lessons and scrutinised relevant documentation.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Since the appointment of a new acting headteacher in February 2008, the school has included many of the approaches promoted by the National Strategy in its school improvement work. The senior leadership team and teachers both agree that this has made practice much more consistent and raised expectations. The school works closely with the local authority to tailor strategy resources to meet its context and values the quality of the support it receives from consultants. Through regular lesson observations and evaluations of work in pupils’ books, senior leaders judge that the use of these resources and guidance from consultants has already been influential in improving the quality of teaching and learning across the school. They particularly value part played by Assessing Pupils’ Progress in supporting their drive to increase the school’s effectiveness. However, they also acknowledge Alexandra House 33 Kingsway
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Ms A Edkins Headteacher Kingshurst Primary School School Close Kingshurst Birmingham B37 6BN that it is too early to demonstrate a significant impact on standards and achievement.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
In the lessons observed during the visit, key principles of the Strategy were evident. For example, teachers are well aware that when focusing on improving writing, it is important to remember the interdependence of speaking, listening, reading and writing. Consequently, they recognise that speaking and listening, as well as being important skills in their own right, underpin reading and writing development. In English and mathematics lessons, there were generally precise success criteria and pupils were clear about the purpose of their activities. In mathematics, learning tasks made pupils reason about number and promoted collaborative working. When pupils offered answers or accounts, the teacher expected them to give full explanations of their ideas as well as their methods. Marking and the use of targets is not consistent across the school. However, there are examples of marking that provides a personal response to what pupils write. This marking
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
helps to increase the pupils’ confidence as writers, and clearly identifies specific areas for improvement.
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Standards are below average overall. In 2008, standards at the end of Key Stage 2 improved and were close to average. However, the school’s own data show that in many year groups significant proportions of pupils are working below age related expectations. Teacher Assessments at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2008, showed that attainment was particularly low in mathematics. Achievement is satisfactory. The school’s use of intervention programmes, such as Springboard and Additional Literacy Support, has not yet contributed to a narrowing of the attainment gap for some groups of pupils.
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion