Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingstrong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
278
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L King Headteacher Ashley School Cawfield Avenue Widnes WA8 7HG

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: identifying good practice in citizenship.

p.1

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23 February 2009 to look at work in citizenship.

p.1

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students, observation of a lesson and scrutiny of subject documentation and students’ work.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The strong student voice which enables students to contribute to almost every aspect of decision-making in the school.  Students’ excellent skills of advocacy and representation through their involvement in the school council and range of committees.  Teaching and learning that meets students’ individual needs.  Close monitoring of students’ involvements in active citizenship within and beyond the school to ensure equality of participation and accessibility.  The comprehensive and coherent curriculum that integrates classroom study with participation and decision-making through active citizenship.  Excellent cross curricular links, particularly with the performing and visual arts.  The outstanding range of extra curricular citizenship trips and activities. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop citizenship in the school.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion