Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Subject Adviser (lead), Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White, Subject Adviser

  • Postcode verified

    N8 9WP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingexceptionallymake good progressconfidentlywell supportedeffectiveeffectively
Criticismlackpoorweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings441w+66
  • Leadership108w+18
  • What needs to improve94w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
630
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Mr A Wickham Headteacher Weston Park Primary School Hornsey North London N8 9WP

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23 January 2009 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of D&T work in lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and standards in D&T

Achievement and standards overall are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards in D&T

 Children make excellent progress in the Reception class. They work confidently and independently to make food products.  Pupils make good progress in D&T as they move through the school and reach standards that are above the expectations for their age by the end of Year 6. Pupils develop good construction and research skills. They understand how to evaluate their designs and make individual and creative responses in a wide range of projects. In some year groups pupils cover work which is too similar to that studied earlier and their knowledge and skills do not develop as quickly. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  D&T is making an outstanding contribution to pupils’ personal development and well-being. Pupils are keen to learn, they follow health and safety rules and their behaviour is excellent.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is good

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 Teachers’ class management is very good. Health and safety are well taught and pupils apply rules well when using tools and equipment. Most teachers have good knowledge of the units of work that they teach but their awareness of progression in the subject is less well developed.  Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are well supported during lessons to participate in activities and make original products. However in some lessons pupils’ poor cutting skills sometimes hinder the quality of their products.  In the best lessons teachers structure learning exceptionally well, often by trialling and modelling the tasks they expect pupils to complete. For example, children’s excellent progress in learning basic cooking skills is underpinned by effective use of text and visual instructions to guide children through the process of following recipes. In Year 3 pupils made excellent progress in applying their earlier research about the

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

most popular fillings to the task of developing a ‘best selling sandwich’.  Plans to routinely check individual pupils’ progress and assess their D&T capability are in development.

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

 The D&T curriculum is broad and meets National Curriculum requirements. Teachers are adapting and modifying schemes of work in interesting ways. For example, pupils have opportunities to work with designers and architects and every pupil has an entitlement to cook. Pupils say D&T is relevant to careers and to life skills but they lack understanding of how some of the systems and processes that they learn about relate to the world around them.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of the subject are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 The nature and purpose of D&T are well understood by leaders at all levels. D&T is effectively led and well resourced. The subject leader makes a good contribution to advise and guide teachers but a lack of access to professional development courses impedes the further development of their technical skills.  Self-evaluation is good and strengths and weaknesses link well to subject development plans. Informal methods of monitoring and evaluating have supported developments to date, but more systematic monitoring of the impact the curriculum has on pupils’ learning and progress would usefully support the school towards developing outstanding practise.

p.2

The extent to which inequality and stereotyping are tackled in D&T

 No stereotyping or gender differences in the performance of boys and girls were evident during the visit.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 reviewing the curriculum to ensure consistency in pupils’ progress and learning across all year groups  developing teachers’ technical skills and their understanding of progression in D&T, and pupils’ awareness of how D&T is applied in the world around them.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion