Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Champak Chauhan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Champak Chauhan

  • Postcode verified

    CB23 7BD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentmake good progressstrengthsconfidentimprovedkeenindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings362w+77
  • Leadership204w+51
  • What needs to improve97w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
644
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Miss S Carpenter Headteacher Barton CofE VA Primary School School Lane Barton Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB23 7BD

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 February 2009 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in history and provision for gifted history pupils.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with you, nominated staff and pupils, a scrutiny of relevant documentation, an analysis of students’ work and the observation of one lesson.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils make good progress and are developing their knowledge, understanding and skills well. Pupils in Year 2, for example, know how seaside holidays have changed over time, while those in Year 6 have good knowledge and understanding of aspects of Victorian life.  At all ages, pupils are developing their chronological understanding well. They know the sequence of major events through the use of timelines. Pupils know how to use different types of historical evidence and can make logical deductions from these. Some have good skills of interpretation.  Pupils’ attitudes and behaviour are excellent. They are keen to participate in whole-class discussions and maintain their concentration on the activities set. They work constructively with each other and with the adults. Some are very interested in history and undertake research work at length, often in their own time.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of history

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of history

 Activities are well organised and meet the various needs of the pupils. The lesson observed had a good learning environment.  The good questioning skills extend the pupils’ understanding.  Pupils’ respond well to the activities and they are regularly praised by the adults.  Time is used efficiently and activities are well paced.  Although lessons are planned in some detail, assessment procedures are not routinely identified in the planning. Marking is regularly undertaken but targets for further improvement are not regularly set.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is broad and balanced, and it meets requirements.  The pupils’ learning experiences are enriched by a study of local history and visits to a good range of historical places. This includes learning about the life of Rupert Brooke, once a local resident, and visits to local museums in Cambridge. Visits are also regularly organised to Peterborough Cathedral when studying the Tudors. In addition, the school has organised Viking Days using a visiting group, and local residents come to talk to pupils about the past. Pupils say how much they value such visits and experiences.

p.2

Leadership and management of history

The leadership and management of history are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of history

 The subject is led by a relatively new teacher who is ably supported by the previous subject leader. Together, they have good knowledge and understanding of strengths in history and what needs to be developed further.  The school has collected a good range of historical resources over recent years and these are regularly used in lessons.

p.2

Subject issue: ICT

 Each classroom has an interactive whiteboard and this used well by both the teacher and the pupils.  Pupils regularly use computers for research work in history and for word processing. They download appropriate information from the internet and can create PowerPoint presentations. However, data handling skills are not developed as well.  The school makes good use of other audio-visual resources, for example recording and using relevant television programmes.

p.2

Subject issue: gifted history pupils

The provision for gifted history pupils is good.

p.3

Subject issue: gifted history pupils

 The school is aware of which pupils are gifted in history and appropriate extension work is set for them in lessons. They are also set additional research work for their independent study.  Such pupils are confident, articulate and can write extensively. The teachers ensure that appropriate questioning is directed at them in lessons to extend their understanding.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensuring that lesson planning and the marking of pupils’ work identifies targets for particular groups and individuals, and that progress towards these targets is regularly evaluated  ensuring that pupils’ skills in handling data when using ICT in history are improved.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion