Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Adrian Lyons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Adrian Lyons

  • Postcode verified

    CO3 3US

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+82Very positivemore positive than 84% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentstrongeffectiveconsistentlyclearimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings267w+80
  • What needs to improve124w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
383
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

Mr J O’Hara Headteacher St Benedict’s Catholic College Norman Way Colchester Essex CO3 3US

p.1

practice visit)

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 January 2009 with David Butler HMI, to look at work in business education.

p.1

practice visit)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on economic and business understanding for all students .

p.1

practice visit)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

practice visit)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of parts of two lessons.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The excellent range of opportunities that are provided to develop students’ enterprise skills and capabilities through the curriculum, including extra-curricular activities.  The way students develop the confidence and skills they need for adult life.  The strong programme of work experience that is built up from Year 8 and is integrated into the curriculum.  The strong commitment of senior and middle leaders to the promotion of business and enterprise education for all students, together with a clear view of how the specialism interrelates with the school’s ethos. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk  The effective programme of business mentoring that supports a substantial number of students in Year 11.

p.1

Areas for development, that we agreed, included:

 implementing plans to offer a wider range of specialist business courses to better meet the needs and interests of all students  strengthening the provision to develop students’ understanding of the economy and personal finance  improving the arrangements for monitoring students’ business and enterprise experiences and assessing the progress they are making so that those who are less well engaged can be more consistently identified and supported.

p.2

Areas for development, that we agreed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business education in the school.

p.2

Areas for development, that we agreed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion