Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 May 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Asyia Kazmi

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Asyia Kazmi

  • Postcode verified

    SE15 2EB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveenthusiasticoutstandingpoliteenjoypositiveeffective
Criticismnot alwaysweakerinconsistencynot successfulbelownot consideratenot consistentnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings749w+20
  • Leadership139w−4
  • What needs to improve115w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
982
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Fox Headteacher The St Thomas the Apostle College Hollydale Road Nunhead London SE15 2EB

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 03 March 2009 to look at work in planning for and implementing the new Key Stage 3 curriculum with particular reference to Year 7.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

impact of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The overall effectiveness of the planning for and implementation of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Standards on entry to the present Year 7 are below average. At this early stage of the implementation of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum, it is not possible to make a firm judgement on its impact on achievement but the progress of students in lessons and in their books is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Students are polite and work well together in lessons and are quick to support each other. Their behaviour in lessons is good. However, outside lessons they are sometimes less considerate.  During classroom discussions teachers are not fully developing students’ speaking and listening skills so they do not actively listen and build upon the responses of their peers. Opportunities to develop personal, learning and thinking skills enabled by the new curriculum have not been incorporated in to subject areas.  Although students report they are learning new things, the higher attaining students sometimes have work that does not challenge them.  Students enjoy the many clubs on offer and take an active part in them. They were enthusiastic about the trips which were a result of collaboration between subjects and would welcome more opportunities to learn outside the classroom.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in Year 7 is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers create a positive environment where learning can take place. They have good subject knowledge and relationships between students and teachers are good.  In the best lessons, teachers plan lessons and structure learning ensuring all students are involved and working at a good pace. Students are given opportunities to work in pairs and assess each others’ work, although this practice is not consistent across subjects.  Where learning is not as successful, teachers overly lead lessons and do not ensure everyone has understood before moving learning on.  Although not fully established across all subjects, very good examples of formative marking were seen, particularly in English. However, it is not always clear that students act on teachers’ helpful guidance.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the new curriculum in Year 7 is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 Fledgling collaborations between subjects which result in learning outside the classroom have been instigated. Although teachers from different subjects have not had the opportunity to plan, teach or assess different skills together, visits to places of interest are beginning to be utilised to bring students’ learning in different subjects together.  Functional skills are being specifically addressed in English and mathematics. However, they have not been incorporated into schemes of work in other subjects. Consequently, students are not explicitly utilising their skills across the curriculum.  Personal, learning and thinking skills have not been considered in a systematic way to identify where students’ skills are weaker and subsequently addressed across the Year 7 curriculum.

p.2

Leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

The leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of the new Key Stage 3 curriculum

 Senior leaders have not established a central system for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the new curriculum. This means that inconsistency in practice across subjects and in the implementation of key features of the new curriculum have not been addressed. A strategic approach to collaboration between subjects is not in place.  Middle leaders are well informed, enthusiastic and welcome the opportunities afforded by the new Key Stage 3 curriculum. However, these opportunities have not been fully utilised. For example, personal, learning and thinking skills have not been developed, and functional skills are not addressed across the curriculum.  Schemes of work have been reviewed in all subjects and some subjects have begun to evaluate their new schemes of work to inform further development.

p.2

Inclusion

The impact of the curriculum on inclusion is good.

p.3

Inclusion

 Very effective use is made of Year 11 prefects to support the induction of new Year 7 students. The prefects provide good care and guidance to Year 7 and are outstanding role models.  Teaching assistants provide good support in lessons to individual students, ensuring they are able to access the curriculum.  Additional induction for vulnerable students provides them with opportunities to visit the school, experience taster lessons and meet the prefects. The impact of this has been a smooth focussed start for Year 7 students.  Form tutors are active in promoting the learning of students. This includes observing students who are experiencing difficulties in lessons and providing feedback to parents on ways forward.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing rigour in monitoring and evaluating at all levels to ensure consistency in practice across subjects in Year 7  ensuring teaching challenges the most able and builds on the skills they already have  utilising the opportunities offered by the new curriculum to enable more effective cross-curricular working, including embedding functional and personal, learning and thinking skills.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the curriculum in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion