Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Hancock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Hancock

  • Postcode verified

    B21 0DP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressstrongeffectivelywell plannedaccuratelyrichenthusiasticenthusiasm
Criticismlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings489w+83
  • Leadership80w+50
  • What needs to improve76w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
635
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Mrs J Roach Headteacher Wattville Primary School Wattville Road Handsworth Birmingham B21 0DP

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 17 March 2009 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of D&T work in lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology

The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement is good and standards are average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils start in the foundation stage with very low levels of skill and capability in D&T. For example only one pupil in a group of six in Class 1 could cut effectively with scissors when making models of owls. Pupils make good progress and, as a result, many cut precisely and accurately in Class 2 when designing and making models of rockets based on a story from the book ‘Whatever next’.  Pupils continue to make good progress and achieve well at Key Stages 1 and 2. Standards of D&T work by the time they leave in Year 6 are average and rising with a strong emphasis on developing creative thinking. The intake comes from a rich and diverse range of communities and all groups of pupils achieve equally as well including Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and English as an additional language.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 D&T work is effectively matched to pupils’ interest and needs. The school is aware more use of systems and control components will further enhance interest and develop new capabilities in the subject. Pupils are enthusiastic ambassadors for D&T. They speak with enthusiasm about what they learn and the subject is making a good contribution to pupils’ personal development.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

The quality of teaching and learning in D&T is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of D&T

 D&T capability is consistently developed through the teaching across Key Stages 1 and 2. Teacher’s subject knowledge is good and the school is extending it through professional development. For example, all members of staff attended a one day D&T course at Birmingham City University arranged at the request of the school.  Very good individual support by all staff during D&T lessons helps pupils to become more capable and confident. D&T work is assessed against national curriculum levels and staff informally moderate judgements. The school is planning to monitor individual progress more closely to speed up progress even more through analysis of assessment data.

p.2

Quality of the D&T curriculum

 The school recognised the D&T curriculum needed revision five years ago and introduced national schemes of work based on the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) units. They are now adapting the schemes in project work which involves other subjects, and they are well planned to meet the needs of the national curriculum.  Systems and control components are less evident in D&T work and the school plans further professional development to increase subject knowledge. Design and make projects are characterised by stimulating contexts which meet the interest of pupils well. Creative design skills such as research and innovation are thoroughly covered.

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

Leadership and management of the subject are good

p.2

Leadership and management of D&T

 The school accurately evaluates the performance of the subject. Leaders and managers at all levels value D&T and are determined to raise achievement. Capacity to ensure the subject continues to grow and develop is good. A strong team ethos exists and the willingness to continue professional development is a feature. The nature of D&T is understood and careful monitoring of the subject’s performance is making sure D&T continues to move forward.

p.2

The extent to which inequality and stereotyping are tackled in D&T

There is no evidence of any gaps between the performance of boys, girls, or any other groups of pupils including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and English as an additional language.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 increasing the use of systems and control components in project work  speeding up progress even more through analysis of assessment data.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion