Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Clive Blanchette
- Postcode verified
B74 2NW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Further identification and harmonisation of existing best practice across all four campuses. p.2
- More explicit reference to the impact of the learner voice in the college’s self assessment arrangements. p.2
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college. p.2
- As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. p.2
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 102
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ms C Braddock Sutton Coldfield Campus Lichfield Road Sutton Coldfield West Midlands B74 2NW
p.1
Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 January 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.
p.1
Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice
The evidence used to inform the judgements made, included: interviews with students and staff; scrutiny of self-assessment and monitoring reports; minutes of curricular and student meetings and a recent student newsletter.
p.1
Features of good practice observed
A strong ethos of learner-focused support through continuously developing strategies to encourage learners to feed back on their experiences. Good use of feedback strategies to directly improve outcomes for individuals through individually-negotiated and challenging personal learning programmes. Clear assessment and review arrangements through learner dialogue. These arrangements ensure that learners understand their progress and receive academic, social and emotional support when they need it. Learner views have directly contributed to improvements in facilities, course design and provision, for example additional seating, enrichment trips and activities, the use of external speakers and flexible attendance patterns for Access learners and employed learners. Outstanding opportunities to develop vocational skills through learner involvement in the design of learner-focused marketing materials and the
p.1
Features of good practice observed
production of informative DVDs. Clear strategies for student participation in quality control and improvement through the involvement of learners in staff selection, in representation on the academic board and in a range of focus groups. Extensive involvement of learners in local and national initiatives such as the establishment of the Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS), local police liaison and business enterprise activities. Outstanding opportunities to develop personal and social skills through the student ambassador programme, through participation on a national radio programme and through advocacy opportunities such as peer mentoring and buddy systems. Outstanding response to the needs of local and national employers ensuring that learners’ needs relating to flexibility of learning and assessment opportunities are met. Very high student satisfaction rates expressed through survey response analysis.
p.1
Areas for development
Further identification and harmonisation of existing best practice across all four campuses. More explicit reference to the impact of the learner voice in the college’s self assessment arrangements.
p.2
Areas for development
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.
p.2
Areas for development
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion