Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Blanchette

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Blanchette

  • Postcode verified

    B74 2NW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • What needs to improve74w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
102
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 77%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms C Braddock Sutton Coldfield Campus Lichfield Road Sutton Coldfield West Midlands B74 2NW

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 January 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made, included: interviews with students and staff; scrutiny of self-assessment and monitoring reports; minutes of curricular and student meetings and a recent student newsletter.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 A strong ethos of learner-focused support through continuously developing strategies to encourage learners to feed back on their experiences.  Good use of feedback strategies to directly improve outcomes for individuals through individually-negotiated and challenging personal learning programmes.  Clear assessment and review arrangements through learner dialogue. These arrangements ensure that learners understand their progress and receive academic, social and emotional support when they need it.  Learner views have directly contributed to improvements in facilities, course design and provision, for example additional seating, enrichment trips and activities, the use of external speakers and flexible attendance patterns for Access learners and employed learners.  Outstanding opportunities to develop vocational skills through learner involvement in the design of learner-focused marketing materials and the

p.1

Features of good practice observed

production of informative DVDs.  Clear strategies for student participation in quality control and improvement through the involvement of learners in staff selection, in representation on the academic board and in a range of focus groups.  Extensive involvement of learners in local and national initiatives such as the establishment of the Learning and Skills Improvement Service (LSIS), local police liaison and business enterprise activities.  Outstanding opportunities to develop personal and social skills through the student ambassador programme, through participation on a national radio programme and through advocacy opportunities such as peer mentoring and buddy systems.  Outstanding response to the needs of local and national employers ensuring that learners’ needs relating to flexibility of learning and assessment opportunities are met.  Very high student satisfaction rates expressed through survey response analysis.

p.1

Areas for development

 Further identification and harmonisation of existing best practice across all four campuses.  More explicit reference to the impact of the learner voice in the college’s self assessment arrangements.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion