Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Jun 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Noonan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Noonan

  • Postcode verified

    LN2 5HQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellstrongeffectivesafeclear
Criticismseriouslylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
280
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Allen Principal Lincoln College College Main Monks Road Lincoln LN2 5HQ

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my recent visit. I am grateful to you and all your staff for their work in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time during the visit to meet me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned, including your students. The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. I noted, in particular:

p.1

Areas of good practice identified:

 The strong focus on meeting the Every Child Matters themes and creating a safe and friendly ethos in the college  The broad range of partnerships and collaborative work that meets the needs of hard to reach learners  The highly inclusive culture and effective student services that support learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities very well  The wide range of procedures to ensure the learner voice is fully represented and taken seriously  The good understanding of the needs of the local community and employers  The clear focus on developing citizenship among learners.

p.1

Point for consideration identified:

 Success rates for all minority ethnic groups (apart from Chinese) are lower than for White learners.

p.1

Point for consideration identified:

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, you will be contacted first. You will be notified of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and you will be provided with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings.

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion