Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Hancock
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school. p.3
- As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance2
“The purpose of D&T is clearly understood and leaders value D&T.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 556
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 24 March 2009 to look at work in Design and Technology (D&T).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of D&T work in lessons.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Design and Technology
The overall effectiveness of D&T was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement and standards in D&T are good.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Many pupils start in Year 3 with standards that are in line with those expected for their age, and sometimes higher. For example, models of famous buildings and landmarks are designed and made with precision and an eye for detail and scale. Pupils achieve well and standards are above those normally found as they move through the school. Achievement is good across a range of practical activities which include the use of systems and control components such as pulleys, gears, and switches for instance when designing and making lamps in Year 4 and fairground rides in Year 6. All groups of pupils including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make equally good progress. The school has a unit for the hearing impaired and very good individual support ensures the pupils Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Achievement and standards
Mr Rowe Headteacher Emmbrook Junior School Emmbrook Road Wokingham Berkshire RG14 1JR make the progress they should in D&T. Pupils’ enjoyment and interest in the subject is evident in discussion. They see much value in learning to develop their D&T capability and skills.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning of D&T
The quality of teaching and learning is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of D&T
Staff work well together as a team to move learning in D&T forward. Teacher’s subject knowledge is good and commands pupils respect. The teaching of design is creative and practical activities are well managed to make best use of the available time. Resources are effectively matched to design projects, for example when designing and making clocks in Year 5. Teachers have the confidence and class control to give pupils the freedom they need to develop creative thinking and innovative ideas. The school is aware assessment practice and better use of data to accelerate pupils progress is an area to develop.
p.2
Quality of the D&T curriculum
D&T programmes successfully cover national curriculum requirements. Qualification and Curriculum Authority (QCA) units are integrated into project work, for example designing and making honey bread in Year 4 as part of a topic on ancient Egypt. The needs and interests of pupils are well met through good application of subject knowledge, for instance in Year 6 when explaining how forces and gravity work on a fairground ride. The school is aware of areas where improvements can be made and is exploring linking experiences using food in topic work with D&T activities.
p.2
Leadership and management of D&T
Leadership and management of the subject are good.
p.2
Leadership and management of D&T
The purpose of D&T is clearly understood and leaders value D&T. The school has maintained the momentum to deliver creative subjects for some time. Strengths and areas for development are well known and the subject is moving forward at a time when the school has other important priorities.
p.2
The extent to which inequality and stereotyping are tackled in D&T
Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are fully supported and make similar progress to other groups of pupils. There is no evidence of any gaps between girls and boys performance.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
assessment practice and using data about individual’s performance to accelerate their progress linking experiences using food in topic work with D&T activities.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As explained in the previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion