Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bob Hamp

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bob Hamp

  • Postcode verified

    TQ4 7EJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • What needs to improve57w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
88
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 77%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms P Denham Vice Principal South Devon College Vantage Point Long Road Paignton Devon TQ4 7EJ

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 January 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Managers at all levels give a high priority to the views of students in maintaining and building on the college’s outstanding provision.  An open and mutually respectful environment that values student involvement and allows students to voice their opinions to all staff, including the principal, in a common understanding that students will be listened to.  An effective range of initiatives that engage and capture the learners’ voice. These include student surveys and focus groups that help the college to review, evaluate and improve provision.  A good range of opportunities for students to become formally involved as student representatives and ambassadors, and for additional involvement in college and community activities, such as student sports development officers.  Effective learner-led activities such as organising the annual being healthy event, managing the ‘student voice’ magazine and the recently established

p.1

Features of good practice observed

college radio, and undertaking risk assessments for visits and trips.  A growing prominence given to the wider ‘user voice’ through student, employer and parent focus groups that provides feedback into the college self- assessment process and report.  Good student representation in a wide range of college processes and activities, including staff selection panels, new building projects, the student sustainability group, the selection of new courses and the ‘Teen Parent’ initiative.

p.1

Areas for improvement

 Raise the awareness among all students of the role of student representative.

p.2

Areas for improvement

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for improvement

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion