Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

William Baidoe-Ansah

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    William Baidoe-Ansah

  • Postcode verified

    PE1 4DZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
280
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Lawson Principal Peterborough Regional College Park Crescent Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 4DZ

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my recent visit on 2 December 2008. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time during the visit to meet me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned, including your students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. I noted, in particular:

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The good development of your induction and tutorial programme to focus better on aspects of equality and diversity, citizenship and the ‘respect agenda’.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The good and productive partnerships you have with other agencies in developing effective community cohesion projects, in particular the Imam training and the Unity Peacemakers project.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The effective promotion of ‘the learner voice’ through the student union and the wide range of possibilities learners are afforded to participate in decision making.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 We also discussed the need to develop further the capture and analysis of data in relation to learners’ participation in extra-curricular and other college activities to support improvements.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, we will contact you first. We will notify you of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and provide you with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings.

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion