Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Deborah Vaughan-Jenkins

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deborah Vaughan-Jenkins

  • Postcode verified

    NN3 7RR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+50Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve109w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
135
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 23%About the inspection 72%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr C Moody Principal Moulton College West Street Moulton Northamptonshire NN3 7RR

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 28 January 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, observation of a mid-year review and scrutiny of relevant documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The college has fostered a culture of respect and openness that enables learners to express their views freely.  The creation of an inclusive learning environment has enabled students from across the college’s eight sites to feel they are valued and listened to.  Leaders and managers demonstrate a strong commitment to meeting, and exceeding, students’ expectations of their educational experience at the college.  An increasingly personalised approach to students’ enrolment and application processes is used effectively to raise learners’ aspirations and outlook of what they can achieve. This includes a thorough initial assessment and interview process. Retention rates continue to be very high with very few students leaving their programme of study.  The mid-year review forum is a well-established and managed process that contributes very effectively to capturing students’ views at course level. The

p.1

Features of good practice observed

approach is well structured and includes students’ opinions on a wide range of college provision including facilities, assessment and the quality of teaching.  Strong pastoral support systems exist through the college’s student support services including the use of tutorials as a vehicle to discuss individual issues. Success rates of students in receipt of additional support are exceptionally high.  A wide range of written surveys are undertaken throughout the academic year to help the college review and improve its provision. In addition to two annual surveys as part of course review process, students’ views are sought on aspects including, the learning resource centre, the quality of catering, and the views of learners aged 14 to 16.

p.1

Areas for development

 To broaden the range of methods by which to feedback the positive action taken by the college in response to learners’ views, and to capture more effectively the influence and impact of the learner voice within the college’s self-assessment report.  To give greater prominence in the college's learner involvement strategy to the views of different groups of learners, including by ethnicity and disability.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion