Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Blanchette

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Blanchette

  • Postcode verified

    S41 7NG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessful

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings27w0
  • What needs to improve76w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
101
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 76%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms J McArthur Principal Chesterfield College Infirmary Road Chesterfield S41 7NG

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on the 7 January 2009 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included a careful reading of all the documents supplied to me in advance of my visit, an earlier self assessment report (SAR), and the most recent inspection report, interviews with key staff and learners and additional documents provided on site.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 A genuine culture of inclusivity within which the views of learners of all abilities and backgrounds are valued.  The learners’ voice is an integral and effective part of the College’s quality improvement arrangements.  Productive and well-considered data produced through learner surveys and other feedback leading to a range of improvements for learners including improvements to induction, widening of access to IT resources, more comprehensive careers guidance and improved health and welfare facilities.  Particularly good use of opportunities to enhance the curriculum through enrichment activities in which learners are practically involved in the re-design of learning resources.  Learner involvement activities which are particularly productive in increasing learners’ social confidence and in the development of applicable, vocationally- related skills.  Good involvement of parents/carers ensuring that learners work in a safe,

p.1

Features of good practice observed

supportive environment.  Productive use of employer feedback to ensure that learners’ work-related experiences are responsive to local needs.  Very well coordinated academic and pastoral support structure that has a clear focus on providing feedback that supports learner achievement and retention.  Wide variety of effective strategies, including comprehensive learner surveys, well-established student ambassador programme, annual student conference, and representation on the academic council and the governing body to capture the voice of all learners.

p.2

Areas for development

 Continue to develop ways to capture the learners’ voice using a variety of electronic media.  Enhance the sharing of successful approaches to capturing the learners’ voice across all five directorates.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion