Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Fisher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Fisher

  • Postcode verified

    M14 5RB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w−20
  • What needs to improve71w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
98
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 30, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 5%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 82%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs M Hunter Principal Xaverian College Lower Park Road Manchester M14 5RB

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on Thursday 4 December 2008, to look at work on capturing the user voice. I am particularly grateful to you and your staff for spending time with me and for producing a range of very relevant and helpful documents. I should also be pleased if you would give my thanks to the students who spoke to me during the day.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of a range of documents, observation of a College Student Council meeting, and a tour of the student support area, learning support suite, tutorial/ALS rooms and the Chapel/Chaplaincy/RE area.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Very high priority given by the Principal, senior managers and staff to the importance of the user voice in maintaining and enhancing the college’s outstanding provision.  Application of the user voice in upholding strong social cohesion and full student integration within a caring, inclusive Christian college community.  Very sound emphasis on encouraging students to participate in the daily life of the college and to voice their concerns and ideas for change. The college is particularly successful in seeking, listening to and responding to students’ views.  Very strong commitment to effective student involvement in the college’s strategic and operational processes and practices, such as the college’s staff selection process, the assembly programme and the re-design of the learning support suite.  Well developed relationships with feeder schools that allows the learning needs of new students to be understood and transition made easier, which also makes a

p.1

Features of good practice observed

positive contribution to retention and achievement of students. Potential students and their parents/carers are provided with college taster days and parents’ evenings.  Very responsive curriculum offer in response to learners’ voices. Recent curricular developments include film studies, textiles, a BTEC science award and an NHS cadets’ programme.  Extensive tailoring of programmes around learners’ needs. Currently, the sports provision is being re-designed and extended in response to students’ articulated requirements.  Effective use of relationships with employers who provide work experience, careers talks, occupational mentoring, leadership training, and internships in response to students’ identified requirements.  Extensive range of opportunities provided for students to discuss their learning needs and to obtain additional support, such as that provided by learning mentors and student ambassadors. The college is extremely successful in identifying

p.2

Features of good practice observed

students who have dyslexia which in some cases has not been diagnosed previously.

p.2

Areas for development

 Continue to develop and implement the draft Student Involvement Strategy and formally measure the effects of the strategy on student recruitment, retention, achievement, participation and satisfaction.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion