Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ann Janssen

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ann Janssen

  • Postcode verified

    HA1 3HX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings32w0
  • What needs to improve44w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
76
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Harty Principal St Dominic’s Sixth Form College Mount Park Avenue Harrow-on-the-Hill Middlesex HA1 3HX

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 2 December 2008 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: attendance at the student council meeting, observation of humanities learner focus groups, interviews with two groups of learners, a comprehensive tour of the college and examination of documentation including recent self assessment report (SAR).

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 A comprehensive range of approaches which successfully capture the learners’ voice and shape the college provision and quality of teaching and learning. This includes effective representation through the student council and a student forum which provides feedback directly to tutor groups and learners in subject areas.  A successfully fostered open culture that enables learners to influence and improve the quality of the overall learning experience at the college.  A successful strategy to engage a wide range of staff across the college in gathering learners’ views and in communicating with learners and other partners.  A highly responsive and listening college that reacts to learner’ concerns in a practical way.  Very effective strategies to bring together the different aspects of the learner voice so that change and improvements are made.  Innovative and continuously evolving activities to engage all learners in

p.1

Features of good practice observed

expressing their views. This includes learner involvement in the recruitment of new staff and participating in internal course inspection activities.  Inclusion of impact analysis in the SAR that identifies how the college has been responsive to learners. This includes changes in practice in teaching delivery and to the structure of courses and on the way feedback on performance is given to learners.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion