Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bob Hamp

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bob Hamp

  • Postcode verified

    SY11 3JA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings29w0
  • What needs to improve59w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
87
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Harris Assistant Director Derwen College Whittington Road Oswestry Shropshire SY11 3JA

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 21 November 2008 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 Staff have a clear commitment to an open and mutually respectful environment that encourages learner involvement, on a formal and informal basis, both at a strategic and operational level.  Well established student council that is effective in representing learners in all aspects of college life and of presenting student’s views to staff and governors.  Recent membership of national union of students (NUS) has provided an additional forum for learner voice.  Good use is made of the citizenship syllabus, through the personal development programme, to allow all students to be involved and participate more effectively in college activities.  Good student representation on a wide range of college processes and committees, including staff selection panels, new building projects, healthy living and the equality and diversity working groups.  Personal tutors have a good understanding of individual needs. Students are

p.1

Features of good practice observed

particularly well supported when choosing their personalised programmes and in supporting the articulation of their views for the student perception of college (SPOC) survey.  Good initiatives to support learner voice including: use of video conferencing to develop confidence and support decision making during the transition from the college to further education or employment; the use of ‘a day in the life’ analysis of individual student experiences that includes both formal and informal observations.  Students assist their departments, at the self assessment moderation panel, to secure the proposed department self assessment (SAR) grade with supporting evidence.  Students have been effective in lobbying staff in the Bradbury centre for the purchase of ICT equipment and in changing opening hours. Students have also been successful in developing the centre into a focus for internal communications and events and for wider communications with families and friends using webcams.

p.1

Areas for development

 Further develop the opportunities for students to assess and influence their own learning experiences.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on Ofsted's website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion