Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Ryan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Ryan

  • Postcode verified

    NW8 6HX

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve75w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
102
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 84%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms K Bedford Headteacher Swiss Cottage School Avenue Road London NW8 6HX

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 November 2008 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included observations, including external presentations, meetings with staff and children, scrutiny of documents and video evidence.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school places its children at the heart of its work, ensuring that they all achieve as highly as possible. Children make outstanding progress in their educational achievement, personal development and behaviour. School leaders are seeking constantly to develop and improve practice.  The user voice is at the core of all this work, in terms of equipping all children with the skills and tools to make their voice heard, in listening actively to what they say and in nurturing their independence and confidence.  Their individual needs drive the work of the school. A very high proportion arrive with few communication skills; during their time at the school they acquire the ability to communicate well using, sign language, speech, symbols or writing.  Staff are adept at ‘active listening’ ensuring that every child has a voice, for example through the enthusiastic participation of all children in the news,

p.1

Features of good practice observed

commendation and music assemblies.  Children are taught to use symbols, words and speech to articulate and manage their feelings and emotional responses, for example in the school’s work on anti- bullying.  The introduction of person-centred learning has transformed the annual review process, ensuring that the child’s views and experiences are the driver, while retaining rigorous targets for further improvement.  Choice underpins the teaching methodology, ensuring that children are empowered to make decisions and take responsibility for their actions as well as express preference, for example in relation to their preferred learning styles and healthy life choices. They are also supported in reviewing their learning, using a variety of support tools and resources to chronicle their learning journey.  Many children also develop their voice and confidence through participation in a wide range of activities including sport and outdoor activities, the sports

p.1

Features of good practice observed

leadership programme, borough-wide initiatives, and regular presentations about their achievements.  By the time children reach Key Stages 3 and 4 many demonstrate their independence through travelling independently, making choices about educational progression, managing projects and undertaking work experience.  Photographs, video and power point presentations are used routinely and successfully to record their views, and discuss with pupils their progress and achievements.  The school’s inclusive ethos is outstanding. All children, whatever their ability and needs are actively supported to achieve their very best. Strategies and resources tailored to individuals enable children to communicate, participate fully in their own development, support their peers and contribute to the work of the school as a whole. Barriers to participation are broken down through one-to-one work with individual children.

p.2

Features of good practice observed

 Children are consulted and involved routinely in strategic planning and development, for example improving lunch arrangements, shaping curriculum provision, appointing new staff and contributing to the design of the new school.

p.2

Area for development

 Extend the already excellent practice, through the introduction the planned pupil leadership group approach to mirror that already introduced for staff.

p.2

Area for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the centre.

p.2

Area for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion