Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

SEEVIC COLLEGE

Inspected — · published 10 Aug 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    SEEVIC COLLEGE

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingeffectiveimprovedeffectivelyvery highsuccessfullystrengths
Criticismdeclineinadequatedeclinedbelowpoorinsufficientlyvariationlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1286w+46
  • Leadership1244w+63
  • What needs to improve246w+69

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,731
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 45%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Audience Post-sixteen Published date June 2009 Provider reference 130681 Provider reference 130681

p.1

Published date June 2009 SEEVIC COLLEGE Inspection report

p.1

Contents

Background information........................................................................................ 3 Summary of grades awarded ................................................................................ 5 Overall judgement................................................................................................ 6 Key strengths and areas for improvement………………………………………………………….. 7 Main findings ....................................................................................................... 8

p.2

Grading

Inspectors use a four-point scale to summarise their judgements about achievement and standards, the quality of provision, and leadership and management, which includes a grade for equality of opportunity.

p.3

Grading

The descriptors for the four grades are: • grade 1 – outstanding • grade 2 – good • grade 3 – satisfactory • grade 4 – inadequate

p.3

Grading

Further information can be found on how inspection judgements are made at www.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.3

Scope of the inspection

In deciding the scope of this inspection, inspectors took account of: the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans; comments from the local Learning and Skills Council (LSC); and the previous inspection report ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ); reports from the inspectorate annual assessment visits or quality monitoring inspection; and data on learners and their achievement over the period since the last inspection. This inspection focused on the following aspects:

p.3

Scope of the inspection

 overall effectiveness of the organisation and its capacity to improve further  achievement and standards  quality of provision  leadership and management.

p.3

Description of the provider

1. SEEVIC College is a large sixth form college with its main campus situated in Benfleet, Essex and a new further education campus in Basildon town centre. The college offers a more diverse curriculum than is often seen in sixth form colleges. Almost half of its students study vocational qualifications with substantial numbers studying foundation and intermediate courses. A small number of students are on work-based learning and Train to Gain programmes. The college offers courses in 14 of the 15 sector subject areas. The number of students aged 16 to 18 has grown steadily from 2,063 in 2003/04 to 2,484 in 2006/07. Students attend the college from an increasingly diverse catchment area including Southend, Castle Point, Rochford, Basildon and Thurrock. In 2007/08, some 7% of students identified themselves as coming from a minority ethnic heritage; a higher percentage than is found in the surrounding local

p.3

Description of the provider

communities. Unemployment is generally below average. The proportion of young people achieving five high grades at GCSE, including English and mathematics in Essex and Southend, is above average; however, there is considerable variation between schools. In Thurrock, the figure is well below average. The mission of the college is: ‘SEEVIC College will be responsive to the needs of the community working in partnership to promote and provide a range of high quality learning opportunities’.

p.3

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

Equality of opportunity Good: contributory grade 2

p.5

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

2. The effectiveness of provision is good. Achievement and standards are satisfactory overall and some aspects are good. Students achieve well on vocational courses and make excellent progress compared with their prior attainment at GCSE. However, in 2007/08, success rates at General Certificate of Education (GCE) A and AS level declined to below average.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

3. Teaching and learning are good with thorough planning and imaginative use of information learning technology (ILT). Students produce work of a good standard and take part confidently in discussions. In a minority of lessons, teaching does not address the full range of students’ needs, particularly for the most able.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

4. The college’s response to meeting the needs and interests of students is outstanding. The diverse range of provision includes a substantial vocational offer and courses from entry to advanced level. Students’ opportunities have been enhanced by the establishment of New Campus Basildon. Educational and social inclusion are good.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

5. Guidance and support are good with particularly effective academic and additional learning support. Students are encouraged effectively to become independent learners and have easy access to a good range of specialist support.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

6. Leadership and management are good. Courses identified as underperforming in 2007/08 have been subject to particularly close and rigorous quality improvement strategies. Early indications suggest that this has resulted in measurable improvements. The promotion of equality of opportunity is good as is students’ knowledge and understanding of equality and diversity.

p.6

Capacity to improve Good: Grade 2

7. The college’s capacity to improve is good. The self-assessment report (SAR) for 2007/08 acknowledged fully the decline in success rates at GCE A and AS level and reflected this in the SAR grades. Action plans and targeted quality improvement have secured improvements in areas including attendance, retention and early examination outcomes. Inspectors agreed with the higher grades awarded in the updated SAR. Managers, teachers and governors have concentrated appropriately on courses identified as underperforming and demonstrate determination and confidence in their ability to improve outcomes. Most curriculum areas are well managed with staff clearly accountable for students’ outcomes. College resources are targeted on improvement and financial management is good.

p.6

improvement since the last inspection

8. The college has made good progress since the last inspection. Punctuality and attendance have improved and are now good. Feedback to students on how to improve their work is now much better and opportunities for staff to contribute to decision making have been increased. The strengths identified at the last inspection in the promotion of equal opportunities, productive partnerships and enthusiastic and courteous students have been maintained. However, the wide variation in students’ progress based on their prior attainment remains an area for further improvement.

p.7

Key strengths

 good success rates on vocational courses  students’ excellent progress on level 3 vocational courses  very good development of independent learning skills  particularly effective academic and additional learning support  outstanding response to the needs and interests of students  effective leadership and management of quality improvement.

p.7

The college should address:

 below average success rates at GCE A and AS level  students’ poor progress compared to their prior attainment in some GCE A- level subjects  the minority of teaching where students are insufficiently challenged and stretched.

p.7

Achievement and standards Satisfactory: Grade 3

9. Achievement and standards are satisfactory and some aspects are good. This concurs with the college self-assessment report. Success rates at levels 2 and 3 for students aged 16 to 18 studying vocational courses are good and improving. Despite a decline in 2007/08, success rates at level 1 remain above average. Value-added measures show the significant number of students studying vocational courses at level 3 make excellent progress compared to their prior attainment at GCSE. Different groups achieve similar success rates, including those in receipt of additional learning support. Many students produce work of a good standard and take part confidently in discussions.

p.8

Achievement and standards Satisfactory: Grade 3

10. Success rates at GCE A and AS level have improved steadily in the years up to 2006/07. However, in 2007/08, they declined to below average at both levels, particularly at AS level. The college has taken vigorous and targeted action to improve outcomes and early indications, including attendance, retention and early examination results, indicate that these measures have improved outcomes. It is, however, too early to judge the full impact of quality improvement in this area. Most students studying GCE A and AS level courses make satisfactory progress compared to their prior attainment but there are wide variations between subjects with students making poorer progress in some subjects. Progression between levels, and in particular from AS level to GCE A level, is very high and the vast majority of students progress from level 3 courses to higher education or employment.

p.8

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

11. The quality of provision is good. This matches the college’s self-assessment. Teaching and learning are good. Improvements to teaching and learning are grounded firmly in a robust lesson observation process. Most students are engaged actively in interesting and well planned lessons. Information learning technology (ILT) is used creatively to check learning and enliven lessons. Teachers give clear guidance on the progress students make at their half-termly reviews and they act rapidly to help those who are not making the progress expected. Many students receive excellent feedback which helps them improve. The college has identified that a minority of teaching does not meet the needs of all students fully. In these lessons, learning is not planned sufficiently well to challenge the most able to achieve the highest standards of which they are capable.

p.8

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

12. All students are initially assessed. Individual additional support is provided promptly to those identified as needing it either through this assessment or later in their studies. Students’ progress is checked regularly and they have clear targets for improvement. Teachers keep detailed records that ensure these students receive relevant help whenever they need it. Success rates for those receiving support are similar to the rates for other students. 13. The college’s response to meeting the needs and interests of students is outstanding. The range of courses is extensive. Level 1 provision has increased and the college piloted the development of the foundation learning tier successfully. Provision to meet the needs of individual students is particularly good including those who are gifted and talented. Links with local schools are very productive and projects, such as the young apprenticeship programme and

p.8

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

the development of new diplomas with local work-based learning providers, have been successful. Employer engagement is excellent. The establishment of the Commercial Development Unit (CDU) after an extensive review of employer-related provision has built on established employer links providing work experience for some 1,200 students a year. Social and educational inclusion are good. The further development of apprenticeships, Train to Gain provision and New Campus Basildon (NCB) are extending choices for adults and younger learners particularly well. Enrichment activities are wide ranging, clearly linked to Every Child Matters (ECM) themes, promoted particularly well to students and participation is high. Progression rates through course levels into employment and higher education are very high and student destinations are monitored closely. The college is a welcoming, safe, yet stimulating environment where success is celebrated and students enjoy attending.

p.9

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

14. Guidance and support for students are good. Group tutorials are focused well on the ECM themes. Tutors respond promptly to requests for further development of employability skills, study skills and financial literacy. Individual tutorials focus particularly effectively on supporting learning and developing students’ skills as independent learners. Tutors coach students in ways of communicating with their teachers. This helps students to take responsibility for identifying the skills they need to improve their performance. Tutors and students learn to write specific and measurable targets. Students at both sites benefit from easy access to a range of specialist support, including counselling, health advice and careers guidance. In addition, students with particular barriers to learning are encouraged to attend courses which develop their social and communication skills.

p.9

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

15. A comprehensive interview and induction process helps students, including adults and those from the new campus, to make a smooth transition to college. Good collaboration with partners, including the Connexions service and Aim Higher, supports students in making well-informed choices about their destinations after college.

p.9

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

16. Leadership and management are good. This agrees with the college’s self- assessment report. The decline in GCE A and AS level success rates in 2007/08 has been the subject of rigorous quality improvement actions and early indications suggest measurable improvements. The college’s strategic mission to provide diverse and flexible provision at all levels is well understood and supported by managers, staff and governors. 17. The college self-assessment report for 2007/08 presents a frank and realistic appraisal of student outcomes with lower grades reflecting the decline in success rates at GCE A and AS level. The updated self-assessment provides detailed evidence to support higher grades in key areas. Inspectors agreed with the higher grades awarded. Quality improvement strategies have been applied consistently and effectively at courses identified as underperforming. Most curriculum areas are well managed with staff clearly accountable for students’

p.9

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

18. The observation of teaching and learning is accurate and effective in improving the quality of teaching and learning. Explicit links exist between observation, staff development and performance management. College managers have established successfully an attractive new facility catering for particularly vulnerable learners in an area with high levels of deprivation. Learning resources are generally good but the college building, although well maintained, is ageing. The well-developed plans for a new build are currently subject to national constraints.

p.10

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

19. Governance is good. Governors demonstrate very good knowledge of the standards achieved by students and receive regular reports on the impact of quality improvement. The college benefits from their broad range of skills and particularly detailed local knowledge. Financial management and value for money are good. The college complies with the current government requirements for safeguarding children and vulnerable adults.

p.10

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

20. The promotion of equal opportunities is good. Equality and diversity policies, procedures and action plans are clear, comprehensive and challenging, including the single equality scheme. The college is compliant with the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. Arrangements relating to equality and diversity impact assessments are comprehensive, leading to closely monitored actions for improvement. Success rates are analysed usefully by gender, disability, ethnicity and age and there are no significant differences between groups of students. The participation rates of minority ethnic students are increasing and are above average compared to the local community. Provision at New Campus Basildon has engaged learners successfully who were not in education, employment or training. Access to accommodation has improved and the college is now compliant with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 2005. Staff routinely access a range of equality and diversity

p.10

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

training. Students’ rights and responsibilities in relation to equality and diversity are introduced well at induction and reinforced through tutorials, whole college activities, posters, displays and in lessons. Students’ knowledge and understanding of equality and diversity are good.

p.10

Table 1

Success rates on mainstream level 1 long qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared to the national rates for colleges of a similar type

p.11

Table 1

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.11

Table 1

05/06 533 85 71 14 146 71 57 14 06/07 625 90 73 17 13 85 64 21 All Long - Level 1 07/08* 559 79 19 84 05/06 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 06/07 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... GNVQs/ AVCEs 07/08 05/06 2 100 ... ... ... ... ... ... 06/07 1 100 ... ... ... … ... ... NVQs

p.11

Table 1

07/08 05/06 531 85 71 14 146 71 57 14 06/07 624 90 72 18 13 85 64 21 Other

p.11

Table 1

07/08* 559 79 19 84 * college data 2007/08

p.11

Table 2

Success rates on mainstream level 2 long qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared to the national rates for colleges of a similar type

p.11

Table 2

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.11

Table 2

05/06 956 79 78 1 127 65 65 0 06/07 888 81 82 -1 142 67 65 2 All Long - Level 2 07/08* 909 82 104 77 05/06 413 81 82 -1 33 94 67 27 06/07 398 85 83 2 35 86 68 18 GCSEs

p.11

Table 2

07/08 403 84 18 67 05/06 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 06/07 2 100 78 22 ... ... ... ... GNVQs/ AVCEs 07/08* 8 50 05/06 12 92 ... ... 28 75 69 6 06/07 13 69 ... ... 22 86 71 15 NVQs

p.11

Table 2

07/08* 7 57 21 95 05/06 531 77 70 7 66 45 62 -17 06/07 475 77 79 -2 85 54 62 -8 Other

p.11

Table 2

07/08* 491 81 64 73 * college data 2007/08

p.11

Table 3

Success rates on mainstream level 3 long qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared to the national rates for colleges of a similar type

p.12

Table 3

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.12

Table 3

05/06 5554 83 84 -1 139 64 65 -1 06/07 6159 83 85 -2 110 68 69 -1 All Long - Level 3 07/08* 6644 80 70 05/06 1886 89 93 -4 20 100 78 22 06/07 2020 90 93 -3 10 50 80 -30 A/A2 Levels 07/08* 2345 88 91 05/06 3268 80 79 1 8 100 58 42 06/07 3681 80 81 -1 4 25 61 -36 AS Levels

p.12

Table 3

07/08* 3753 74 56 05/06 177 69 77 -8 ... ... ... ... 06/07 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... GNVQs/ AVCEs 07/08 05/06 3 67 ... ... 23 57 64 -7 06/07 3 67 ... ... 41 76 72 4 NVQs

p.12

Table 3

07/08* 6 72 26 88 05/06 220 80 79 1 88 55 62 -7 06/07 455 78 80 -2 55 69 66 3 Other

p.12

Table 3

07/08* 540 81 58 53 * college data 2007/08

p.12

Table 3

____________________________________________________________________

p.12

Table 3

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion