Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Dec 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Henry Moreton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Henry Moreton

  • Postcode verified

    WN2 4LG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery wellexcellentpositiveenjoyricheffectivelyeffectivewell prepared

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings485w+88
  • Leadership155w+62
  • What needs to improve69w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
682
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 0207 421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Abbott Acting Headteacher Hindley Community High School Mornington Road Hindley Wigan Lancashire WN2 4LG

p.1

Economic Education (PSHEE)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 25 November 2008 to look at work in PSHEE.

p.1

Economic Education (PSHEE)

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on economic well-being and information, advice and guidance (IAG).

p.1

Economic Education (PSHEE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Economic Education (PSHEE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: discussions with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Economic Education (PSHEE)

The overall effectiveness of PSHEE was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement

 Students have positive attitudes towards PSHEE and particularly enjoy the visiting experts who are brought in to deliver some activities.  Students’ knowledge, understanding and awareness of the issues around sex and drugs are good.  Students know how to stay fit and healthy.  The school ensures that good support is provided for students with learning difficulties and disabilities so that they fully participate in all PSHEE activities.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of PSHEE

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of PSHEE

 In the four lessons seen, students of all abilities were attentive and very well behaved.  Subject teachers address PSHEE issues in lessons. For example, GCSE English students develop an excellent awareness of relationships while studying John Steinbeck’s ‘Of Mice and Men’.  Teachers’ lesson planning routinely address enterprise activities and students’ economic well-being.  Although students’ progress is assessed, it is not systematic across all the strands of PSHEE, and as students move through the school.  The support and guidance provided to students is focussed and responds to specific needs.  The needs of vulnerable girls are very well provided for through the weekly girls’ group.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 It is responsive to the need of students and takes their views into account.  Students’ social skills are well developed through a rich extra-curricular programme, especially in community-based drama.  Students are asked what they think about PSHEE activities and changes are made in response.  Visitors are used well. The termly personal development days for all students complement the PSHEE curriculum very well.  Outside lesson time, the team of non-teaching Heads of Year and teaching assistants support students very effectively.  Students have good access to expert advice such as the school counsellor.  Some students are ‘buddied’ with peers who are good role models. Others benefit from work to develop their personal skills in communication.

p.2

Leadership and management of PSHEE

 School leaders are determinedly pursuing their drive to improve provision in PSHEE. Following detailed consultation they have set out a clear vision for PSHEE within the personal development curriculum.  Provision is enhanced through very good links with the local community and a range of visiting professionals.  The contributions made by subjects are well documented.  Self-evaluation of current provision in PSHEE is broadly accurate.

p.2

guidance

 Students have good access to impartial advice and guidance through the effective links with the Connexions service.  Students have a good understanding of the opportunities available to them after they leave school, and are well prepared.  As a result of the school’s specialism, students are able to gain good experiences in arts related vocational areas.  Students gain good work related experience in hairdressing and plumbing in the newly established skills centre.  Students are given good advice about how to manage their personal finances.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensure that all strands of PSHEE are assessed, recorded and reported to parents.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PSHEE in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion