Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tanya Harber Stuart
- Postcode verified
LA11 6RS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school. p.4
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.4
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum9
“Lessons are well planned.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,217
- longer than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 59, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs L Graves Headteacher Dean Barwick School Witherslack Grange-over-Sands Cumbria LA11 6RS
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 23 March 2009 to look at work in ICT.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the quality of assessment.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three part lessons.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
Dean Barwick school is a much smaller than average school with, at the time of this visit, 28 pupils on role.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be good.
p.1
Achievement and standards in ICT
Achievement is good. Pupils leave the school with standards which are above average.
p.1
Achievement and standards in ICT
Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) with skills and ICT capability which are broadly average. However because of the very small numbers in each year there is a wide range of skills and capabilities. The good teaching and learning in the EYFS means that the individual needs of the children are catered for. In the EYFS children use confidently a large number of ICT resources. These resources include CD players, interactive whiteboards and floor robots. Children in the EYFS make at least satisfactory progress with many making good progress. At Key Stage 1 pupils continue to make at least satisfactory progress. However some higher attaining pupils in Key Stage 1 are not always challenged to achieve as well as they could. By the end Key Stage 2 pupils have made good progress and they leave the school with standards which are above average. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are supported well in
p.1
Achievement and standards in ICT
lessons. During their time at the school they make good progress. These pupils are also able to access appropriate ICT resources. You provide a comprehensive programme to enable the pupils to learn about e-safety, this engages the pupils in writing the internet safety rules. This programme includes links with parents. The pupils are very knowledgeable about the dangers of using new technologies and what they need to do to keep save when using them. The pupils are exceptionally well behaved when they use ICT equipment. They enjoy working together and they work well together, taking turns to use the equipment and respecting each others’ learning styles. The pupils are also respectful to the additional adults who support them when they are using ICT. This use of ICT has enhanced their independent learning skills.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of ICT
The quality of teaching and learning is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of ICT
Members of staff have good subject knowledge. This is used to good effect in lessons. For example in all lessons seen members of staff constantly reinforce the use of correct ICT terminology. This means that the pupils are fully aware of the need to use the correct language. Lessons are well planned. The activities motivate the pupils and they are highly engaged in their learning. In some lessons the good questioning techniques encouraged the pupils to think about their work and how they could improve it. For example in the EYFS children were challenged to consider how they could make their instructions more specific. In all the lessons seen the pupils listened well to each other. This meant that the pupils were able to demonstrate their work to each other and they learnt from each other. This was particularly effective in a lesson where the pupils were learning how to make their own animated films.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of ICT
In many lessons the pupils were able to work independently. Good systems were in place for them to ask each other for help which increased their knowledge and understanding of ICT and developed their social skills. This was particularly well done in a Key Stage 1 lesson when some pupils had to work in another room. They willingly helped each other to develop their work.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum for ICT
The curriculum provided is comprehensive and all pupils receive their statutory entitlement to the ICT National Curriculum. Pupils were enthusiastic about the opportunities they had, particularly when they had controlled floor robots and used digital cameras. The use of ICT is embedded in all areas of the curriculum. Long term, medium term and short term curriculum planning show exactly where ICT is used to support learning. Pupils were also aware of how and when they used ICT to support their learning in other subjects. Progression in all Key Stages is planned. This means that most pupils make good progress during their time at the school and develop their ICT capability well.
p.3
Leadership and management of ICT
Leadership and management of ICT are good.
p.3
Leadership and management of ICT
You have a very limited ICT budget because of the size of your school. This budget is used effectively to ensure that ICT is a tool to improve learning in all areas and for all the pupils. You apply the principles of best value: compare, consult, challenge and competition. The recently completed questionnaire to the Key Stage 2 pupils highlighted the consultation process. You also link with other schools to share good practice and members of staff appreciate these opportunities to visit other schools. You have audited the staff’s ICT skills and capabilities and have put in place training to develop them. You have a clear vision for ICT which is shared with staff. ICT is there to support the learning of the pupils in all areas. This includes the use of ICT to develop your forest school. You have a comprehensive development plan for ICT. This is costed and is time related. It is regularly reviewed and changes made, if
p.3
Use of Assessment
At the beginning of the EYFS children’s ICT skills and capabilities are assessed. The improvements in these skills and capabilities are then comprehensively tracked across the areas of learning. These assessments are tracked through to Key Stage 1. The assessments at the end of Key Stage 1 link into Key Stage 2. At Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 the pupils assess their own progress through ‘can do’ statements. These statements are linked to the ICT National Curriculum levels. These sheets are then monitored by staff to ensure that pupils are making the expected progress. However this assessment tends to be generic rather than specific to each pupil. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are tracked well. There is a comprehensive assessment done related to their learning needs in ICT.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
ensuring that the higher attaining pupils in Key Stage 1 are challenged when using ICT developing the use of assessment to ensure that it is specific to each pupil rather than generic.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion