Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

New College Swindon

Inspected — · published 10 Aug 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    New College Swindon

Page 1 of 16
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingstronggood progresshighly effectiveimprovedvery wellstrengthshigh quality
Criticisminsufficientlyweaknessesinadequateinconsistentinsufficientlowpoornot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings3186w+56
  • Leadership426w+70
  • What needs to improve340w+74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
16
Words of findings
3,895
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Audience Post-sixteen Published date March 2009 Provider reference 130851 Provider reference 130851

p.1

Published date March 2009 New College Swindon Inspection report

p.1

Contents

Background information........................................................................................ 3 Summary of grades awarded ................................................................................ 5 Overall judgement................................................................................................ 6 Key strengths and areas for improvement………………………………………………………….. 7 Main findings ....................................................................................................... 9

p.2

Grading

Inspectors use a four-point scale to summarise their judgements about achievement and standards, the quality of provision, and leadership and management, which includes a grade for equality of opportunity.

p.3

Grading

The descriptors for the four grades are: • grade 1 – outstanding • grade 2 – good • grade 3 – satisfactory • grade 4 – inadequate

p.3

Grading

Further information can be found on how inspection judgements are made at www.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.3

Scope of the inspection

In deciding the scope of this inspection, inspectors took account of: the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans; comments from the local Learning and Skills Council (LSC) or other funding body; and where appropriate the previous inspection report ( www.ofsted.gov.uk ); reports from the inspectorate annual assessment visits or quality monitoring inspection; and data on learners and their achievement over the period since the last inspection. This inspection focused on the following aspects:

p.3

Scope of the inspection

 overall effectiveness of the organisation and its capacity to improve further  achievement and standards  quality of provision  leadership and management.

p.3

Description of the provider

1. New College Swindon was formed in 1983 following a re-organisation of secondary education in Swindon, a unitary authority in Wiltshire. At just under 5%, Swindon has a minority ethnic population higher than in the south-west region as a whole. Employment rates and wages are higher than both regional and national rates but there are nevertheless areas of economic deprivation.

p.3

Description of the provider

2. The prior attainment of Swindon’s school leavers at age 16 is low. The town’s other college (Swindon College) runs predominantly vocational provision at levels 1 and 2 and no longer offers general certificate of education (GCE) A- level courses. Most of Swindon’s schools do not have sixth forms. As a result, New College is the main provider of A-level courses in the town. Around 80% of the college’s full-time equivalent (FTE) learners are aged 16 to 18. Some 80% of students aged 16 to 18 studied at level 3 in 2007/08. The college ran approximately 60 A levels in 2007/08 and in that year the numbers of students completing A levels outnumbered those completing Business and Technology Education Council (BTEC) national diplomas by seven to one. The college runs courses with significant numbers in most sector subject areas. Long courses at levels 1 and 2 account for a growing proportion of the college’s work for this

p.3

Description of the provider

age group, as it strives to meet the needs of learners in Swindon leaving school at age 16 with below average attainment. Around one third of learners joining the college to study AS levels have an average GCSE grade of less than C.

p.4

Description of the provider

3. Included in the college’s provision are Train to Gain for around 800 adults, schools link provision for learners aged 14 to 16 and young apprenticeships, accounting for some 150 learners. The college started a small work-based learning contract in 2007 in the curriculum area of business and administration. Course provision for the local community accounts for around 2,500 learners at a number of local centres but this work is now run with only a small LSC-funded subsidy.

p.4

Description of the provider

4. New College Swindon’s mission is ‘to provide high quality education and training services … helping young people, the community and business to prosper’.

p.4

Leadership and management Good: Grade 2

Equality of opportunity Good: contributory grade 2

p.5

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

5. This is a good college with outstanding features and good capacity to improve its provision further. The past 18 months have seen a significant improvement in success rates for adults and for learners aged 16 to 18 at levels 1 and 2. However, success rates for these learners remain mostly broadly in line with an improving national average. Achievement and standards are good overall. Pass rates and the achievement of high grades for the large numbers of learners studying A levels are good and compare with those in sixth form colleges. Students on science and mathematics courses make particularly good progress in AS and A levels from their starting points on entry to the college. However, there is significant variation in students’ progress across the range of courses and this is broadly average overall. This is an area for development for the college together with addressing the numbers of students who withdraw from

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

part of their programme of study in the first year of their A-level courses.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

6. The quality of provision and teaching and learning are good. Knowledgeable teachers plan lessons well and use a broad range of activities to enthuse and motivate learners. However, lesson planning does not always meet learners’ individual needs sufficiently. The college needs to improve the consistent standard of progress reviews and target-setting for learners across the range of its work, to enable learners to fulfil their potential. The extent to which programmes meet the needs of learners is good. Partnership and collaborative working are good. Educational and social inclusion is outstanding. The college is highly successful in engaging learners from under-represented groups and knows its community well. Provision for enrichment and Every Child Matters outcomes is outstanding and is highly valued by learners. Support and guidance for learners are outstanding. There is a high level of student engagement with

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

additional learning support. This is highly effective in enabling them to achieve.

p.6

Effectiveness of provision Good: Grade 2

7. Leadership and management are good. The college’s leadership, vision and strategic direction are clear and highly responsive to local and national priorities. Accommodation and learning resources are outstanding and financial management is strong. Arrangements to gather learners’ views are highly developed and the college uses the information very well to improve provision. The promotion of equality of opportunity is good. Self-assessment accurately identifies strengths and areas for improvement, although the grades awarded over-state the quality in some areas. The college is insufficiently self-critical in its use of success rate data in assessing its overall progress on achievement and standards.

p.6

Capacity to improve Good: Grade 2

8. The college’s capacity to improve is good. Managers and governors have made significant progress in addressing the weaknesses identified at the last inspection, particularly over the past 18 months. There is now a clear vision and direction of travel, in line with regional and government priorities. Despite the over-generous grades awarded by the college in its self-assessment, quality assurance and self-assessment procedures are good and staff make good use of target setting, self-assessment, lesson observation and review meetings to raise standards. Management information systems produce regular, accurate and reliable data which are readily accessible to managers. The quality of teaching and learning is good. Financial management is good and the college is in a strong financial position. The support and involvement of governors is good. Accommodation and resources are outstanding. The college has well

p.6

Capacity to improve Good: Grade 2

developed plans for expansion over the next few years.

p.7

improvement since the last inspection

9. The college has made good progress in improving the quality of provision since the last inspection. Success rates on long courses for adult learners have improved but remain in line with the increased national average. Success rates for key skills provision have improved significantly and were high in 2007/08. The lesson observation scheme has improved significantly. It now plays a key role in helping to raise the standard of teaching and learning across the college. Teachers now make good use of a wide range of initiatives and technology to extend and inspire students in lessons. The college has comprehensively implemented appropriate arrangements for identifying learners’ numeracy support needs through the introduction of robust initial assessment.

p.7

Key strengths

 high pass rates and achievement of A and B grades on A-level courses  good teaching and learning  outstanding provision for enrichment and Every Child Matters outcomes  good collaborative and partnership working  outstanding support and guidance for learners  outstanding accommodation and learning resources  clear leadership, vision and strategic direction which is highly responsive to local and national priorities  very good collection and use of learners’ views to improve provision  strong financial management.

p.7

The college should address:

 reducing the number of learners who withdraw from part of their programme of study at AS level  the inconsistent progress made by learners aged 16 to 18 across the range of AS and A-level courses  lesson planning to meet all learners’ individual needs more fully  the rigour of procedures for deciding and moderating graded judgements about the quality of the college’s provision  the evaluation of learners’ performance data throughout the college’s provision to allow clearer benchmarking with other similar providers  improving the consistency of progress reviews and target-setting for all learners.

p.7

Contributory grades:

Adults Satisfactory: grade 3 Learners aged 14 to 16 Satisfactory: grade 3

p.9

Contributory grades:

10. Achievement and standards are good overall. For adult learners on long courses and for pupils aged 14 to 16 on school link programmes they are satisfactory. Learners’ outcomes do not justify the college’s own view that achievement and standards are outstanding.

p.9

Contributory grades:

11. At the last inspection retention and pass rates for learners aged 16 to 18 at level 3 were high. However, retention and pass rates for adult learners were a key area for improvement. The past 18 months have seen a significant improvement in those long course success rates that were previously low. In 2007/08 success rates for adults were broadly average. For learners aged 16 to 18 they were broadly average at level 2 and above average at level 1.

p.9

Contributory grades:

12. Success rates for the high numbers of learners aged 16 to 18 studying AS and A-level courses have been at or above the national average for general further education (GFE) and tertiary colleges over the past four years. The college agrees with inspectors that, in the future, this provision should be compared with the same provision in sixth form colleges. By this measure, pass rates and the achievement of high grades in A levels are in line with the high national average and are good. Pass rates in AS qualifications are broadly in line with the national average. A-level success rates are mostly in line with sixth form college averages but at AS level they are low in comparison. This is as a result of learners withdrawing from part of their programme of study during the year. Learners’ progression from AS to A levels is high. In both AS and A-level courses value-added measures indicate that students make positive but broadly

p.9

Contributory grades:

average progress in comparison with their prior attainment. There is considerable variation across the range of subjects, with students in science and mathematics courses making particularly good progress.

p.9

Contributory grades:

13. Success rates in BTEC qualifications are high. In the broad range of GCSEs on offer for learners aged 16 to 18 the achievement of A* to C grades is high. Learners enjoy their studies and their behaviour is exemplary. Their attendance and the standard of their work are good. They develop high levels of practical and work-related skills on vocational courses and work safely. Key skills success rates have improved since the last inspection and are now high. As a result, learners are very well equipped for their future social and economic well-being. The college has identified potential under-performance by adults from a small number of black minority ethnic backgrounds and is taking appropriate steps to investigate potential causes for this. Overall success rates in Train to Gain are good but timely success rates are poor. The college acknowledges this issue and is taking well considered steps to address it.

p.9

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

14. The quality of provision and teaching and learning are good, although the college judges that these are outstanding. Since the last inspection the college has taken highly effective action to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The college’s lesson observation process is robust and reliable and the proportion of lessons judged as good or outstanding has increased since the last inspection. The college has effective measures to raise further the quality of satisfactory lessons and analysis of learner feedback indicates high levels of satisfaction.

p.10

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

15. Teachers manage learning well, including lessons specifically for learners aged 14 to 16, adults in college and community settings and in work-based learning, including Train to Gain. Learners’ absence and lateness are dealt with effectively. Schemes of work are clear and comprehensive. They give priority to the Every Child Matters outcomes and the promotion of learners’ understanding of equality of opportunity.

p.10

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

16. In the best lessons, teachers provide challenging learning opportunities that stretch learners’ abilities. Knowledgeable and well qualified teachers plan well and use a variety of methods to enthuse and motivate learners. They question skilfully to check learning. Resources for teaching and learning are outstanding and teachers use technology well in interactive learning. Learners benefit from the college intranet to support their learning. In less effective lessons teachers plan insufficiently to meet the needs of all learners. A significant minority of lessons provide insufficient challenge for the most able learners.

p.10

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

17. Assessment and internal verification procedures are thorough and ensure the college meets the requirements of regulatory bodies. Most learners’ work is marked accurately and promptly and constructive feedback encourages learners. In a few courses errors remain uncorrected and comments are brief. Teams of experienced assessors provide very good support to work-based learners. In Train to Gain provision, employers value the flexibility of the college’s assessors to meet their needs and those of their employees; assessments are planned well to take place around shift patterns and daily work activities. However, the consistency of progress reviews varies and targets for some learners are too broad. Insufficient attention is given to checking the learners’ understanding of equality of opportunity.

p.10

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

18. The college’s response to meeting the needs and interests of learners is good. Educational and social inclusion is outstanding. The college is highly successful in engaging learners from under-represented groups and knows its community well. Good partnership working is responsive to local and national needs. The college offers courses at college, in the community, in the workplace and online. Sound procedures identify and develop new courses. The curriculum offer ranges from entry level to level 4. The college has plans in place to develop further progression pathways and the growing offer at levels 1 and 2. The college works collaboratively with local schools and is increasingly responsive to the needs of employers with some apprenticeships and growing Train to Gain provision. Learners take good advantage of a wide range of enrichment activities, including sports, cultural groups, visits and volunteering.

p.10

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

Learners make very positive contributions to the college and local community.

p.11

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

19. Guidance and support are outstanding. Comprehensive reports from initial assessment enable teachers to meet individual needs extremely well. Take-up of support is very high. Support for learners with Aspergers Syndrome is outstanding, with support arrangements beginning prior to starting at college. Those learners in Train to Gain for whom English is an additional language receive highly relevant and useful support in the workplace. Particularly effective one-to-one support sessions meet individual needs. Learners who receive additional learning support have success rates at or above college rates. The tutorial system is particularly good and valued by learners. Well managed and resourced, it provides outstanding promotion of Every Child Matters outcomes. Welfare services are well used. Tutors and specialist staff such as counsellors and nurses provide very good pastoral support. Particularly good

p.11

Quality of provision Good: Grade 2

sexual health education addresses teenage pregnancy and Chlamydia, the occurrence of which is high in Swindon. All learners receive good initial advice and guidance for employment and higher education. Learners speak highly of the process. Tutors provide extensive support outside of lessons.

p.11

Contributory grade:

20. Leadership and management are good but not yet outstanding as the college judges them. The college’s mission, strategy and priorities lie at the heart of its self-assessment and improvement plan. They focus appropriately on meeting the needs of learners, achieving learner numbers, improving quality, maintaining best practice, valuing learners and staff and maintaining financial stability. The college is making good progress in all these areas. Managers and staff feel a strong sense of accountability and empowerment to achieve these objectives. There have been some comparatively recent changes to the structure and membership of the senior management team which have had a positive impact on the team’s effectiveness. Communication across the organisation is good. The college has undergone significant, well managed year-on-year growth. The curriculum has been developed well in response to local needs and national priorities.

p.11

Contributory grade:

21. There is a strong focus on raising standards through the implementation of more rigorous quality assurance procedures. These are proving increasingly effective, particularly over the past 18 months. The college has recently upgraded aspects of its management information systems. Managers now have good access to timely and increasingly accurate attendance and success rate data, and financial information. There are highly developed systems in place to gather the views of learners through the use of questionnaires and learners’ active involvement in meetings. There is a good and improving lesson observation scheme in place which helps inform staff development and training priorities. Self-assessment processes accurately identify strengths and areas for improvement, although the grades awarded over-state the quality in some areas. The college has been insufficiently self-critical in its use of success rate

p.11

Contributory grade:

data in assessing its overall progress on achievement and standards. Quality improvement plans are clear and succinct and comprehensively address weaknesses identified in self-assessment.

p.12

Contributory grade:

22. The standard of accommodation and learning resources is outstanding. The college has recently submitted well conceived plans for a 40% expansion and refurbishment of its accommodation to cater for the projected growth in learner numbers over the next five years. The quality of teaching and support staff is high. Student feedback and lesson observation outcomes confirm that teachers have the knowledge and expertise to assure high quality teaching and learning. The application and quality of the staff performance review and target setting procedures are inconsistent across the college although they have improved in the past 12 months.

p.12

Contributory grade:

23. Value for money is good. The college is in a strong financial position and manages its finances well. It has maintained the accommodation and resources to a high standard and has accrued a significant surplus in anticipation of the proposed new build. Success rates have improved. Staff and room utilisation is very good and above average for the sector.

p.12

Contributory grade:

24. Governance is good. Members of the corporation have a valuable and diverse set of skills. Governors are well informed about progress, have good access to reliable data and take an active interest in the work of the college. They are appropriately challenging to the principal and senior managers.

p.12

Contributory grade:

25. The college’s approach to equality of opportunities is good. There is a happy, industrious and safe environment with enthusiastic, supportive staff and a strong sense of community. The college’s approach to the Every Child Matters agenda is outstanding. Diversity and equality of opportunity have a high profile around the college. There are good community links and partnerships with local organisations and employers. The curriculum continues to become more inclusive and responsive to local needs. The college’s response to recent legislation, including equality, race, gender and disability, is good. It comprehensively fulfils its legislative requirements and helps safeguard children and vulnerable adults.

p.12

Table 1

Success rates on mainstream level 1 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type

p.13

Table 1

Notional Level Exp End Year 16 to 18 19+

p.13

Table 1

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.13

Table 1

All Long - 05/06 337 44 69 -25 478 62 65 -3 Level 1 06/07 694 61 74 -13 324 61 70 -9 07/08* 258 82 N/A 545 75 N/A GNVQs/ 05/06 12 67 73 -6 … … ... ... AVCEs 06/07 11 73 72 1 ... ... ... ... 07/08* 53 92 N/A … … N/A … NVQs 05/06 … … … … … … … … 06/07 ... ... ... ... … … … … 07/08* … … N/A … … … N/A … Other 05/06 325 43 69 -26 472 62 65 -3 06/07 683 61 74 -13 323 61 70 -9 07/08 * 205 79 N/A 543 75 N/A

p.13

Table 1

* college data, ** course types or years with low numbers of learners have been omitted to simplify the table.

p.13

Table 2

Success rates on mainstream level 2 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type.

p.14

Table 2

Notional Level Exp End Year 16 to 18 19+

p.14

Table 2

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.14

Table 2

All Long - 05/06 1403 55 66 -11 850 75 66 9 Level 2 06/07 1476 63 70 -7 792 60 69 -9 07/08* 1376 72 N/A 1066 69 N/A GCSEs 05/06 781 66 68 -2 110 66 67 -1 06/07 733 69 71 -2 151 66 70 -4 07/08* 931 71 N/A 157 69 N/A GNVQs/ 05/06 67 58 69 -11 ... ... ... ... AVCEs 06/07 33 73 73 0 ... ... ... ... 07/08* 123 86 N/A … … N/A … NVQs 05/06 14 86 65 21 207 76 68 8 06/07 19 53 68 -15 168 74 69 5 07/08* 43 63 N/A 487 71 N/A Other 05/06 541 36 66 -30 533 76 65 11 06/07 691 56 70 -14 473 52 69 -17 07/08* 279 72 N/A 416 67 N/A

p.14

Table 3

Success rates on mainstream level 3 qualifications, by qualification type, expected end year and age, 2006 to 2008, compared with the national rates for colleges of a similar type.

p.15

Table 3

Notional Level Exp End Year 16 to 18 19+

p.15

Table 3

Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff Starts - Transfers College Rate National Rate Diff

p.15

Table 3

All Long - 05/06 5070 77 71 6 764 60 64 -4 Level 3 06/07 5392 74 73 1 601 61 68 -7 07/08 5542 78 N/A 861 69 N/A A/A2 05/06 1615 90 87 3 122 61 72 -11 Levels 06/07 1834 87 87 0 146 65 76 -11 07/08 1769 90 N/A 140 74 N/A AS Levels 05/06 3126 70 67 3 158 59 55 4 06/07 3307 68 69 -1 204 57 59 -2 07/08 3493 72 N/A 199 58 N/A GNVQs/ 05/06 141 89 66 23 … … … … AVCEs 06/07 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 07/08 N/A … … N/A … NVQs 05/06 … … … … 104 75 63 12 06/07 … … … … 46 61 N/A 07/08 … … N/A … 176 64 73 -9 Other 05/06 186 64 65 -1 368 54 64 -10 06/07 250 55 70 -15 205 61 69 -8 07/08 547 75 N/A 355 75 N/A

p.15

Table 5a

Success rates on work-based learning Train to Gain NVQ programmes managed by the provider/college 2007 to 2009

p.16

Table 5a

Programme End Year Success rate No. of learners* college/provider NVQ rate** overall 55 73 2006/07 timely 126 28 overall 309 82 2007/08 timely 422 36 overall 510 89 Train to Gain NVQ

p.16

Table 5a

Note: 2008/09 data is ‘part year’ only and is representative of the first three months or greater of the LSC contract year

p.16

Table 5a

* Learners who leave later than originally planned are counted in the year they actually leave. This group of learners are then added to the learners who planned to complete in a given year and did so or left earlier than planned ** NVQ qualification success rates are calculated using data supplied to Ofsted by the college/provider prior to inspection

p.16

Table 5a

____________________________________________________________________

p.16

Table 5a

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.16

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion