Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Dec 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Colin Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Colin Smith

  • Postcode verified

    L40 3PP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingeffectivelyimprovedenjoyenjoymentconsistentlysecure
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings539w+59
  • Leadership107w+47
  • What needs to improve123w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
747
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Miss P Coulthard Headteacher SS Peter and Paul Catholic Primary School Ridley Lane Mawdesley Ormskirk Lancashire L40 3PP

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 12 November 2008 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

As outlined in our initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the effectiveness of the school’s approaches to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2008-09 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of the subject, mathematics, was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in mathematics is satisfactory and standards are above average.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 According to the school’s records, most children enter school with mathematical knowledge, skills and understanding above those expected for their age. By the end of the reception year, most pupils exceed the learning goals expected for their age, which indicates satisfactory achievement in the Foundation Stage.  Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory in Key Stage 1 and by the end of Year 2 their attainment is above average.  Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory overall in Key Stage 2 and accelerates in Year 5/6 where teaching is particularly good.  Standards by the end of Year 6 improved in 2008 and are significantly above average.  The school’s increasingly effective tracking of pupils’ progress is helping to improve the achievement of more able pupils and those who require additional support.  Pupils’ understanding of shape is good. Their calculation skills are very secure but some pupils experience difficulty in using and applying their skills when trying to

p.1

Achievement and standards

solve mathematical problems.  Pupils enjoy mathematics and relish a challenge, particularly when using information and communication technology (ICT) and mathematical games to enhance their learning.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

The quality of teaching and learning of mathematics is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of mathematics

 Lessons are calm and purposeful and pupils know what is expected of them. Constructive marking of their work and setting targets for improvement ensure that they understand the next steps in learning.  Mental starter sessions encourage pupils to think quickly and calculate accurately. Effective use of practical apparatus helps them to visualise mathematical ideas.  The use of assessment is improving and is helping teachers to plan activities that are increasingly well matched to pupils’ different learning needs. However, assessment within the lesson is not always used as well as it could be in identifying when pupils are ready to move to the next level.  Pupils’ conceptual understanding is pinpointed and extended very effectively in one of the junior classes but this is not equally well established in all parts of the school.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Pupils have good access to ICT which increases their understanding and enjoyment of mathematics.  The curriculum is sensitively adapted to meet the needs of pupils who find learning difficult. Increasing attention is now being given to the needs of the gifted and talented pupils.  Clear curriculum guidance ensures that pupils’ calculation skills develop smoothly and consistently as they move through school but there is no guidance to develop their problem solving and using and applying skills in the same way.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

The leadership and management of mathematics are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management of mathematics

 Staff absences have hampered the process of monitoring and evaluating the work of the school and what little time has been available has been focussed on improving the teaching of writing. Consequently, some aspects of mathematics have not been examined sufficiently, such as checking the work in pupils’ books and evaluating how effectively teachers develop pupils’ conceptual understanding. This has made it harder to improve teaching and learning.  However, assessments are now being analysed and pupils’ progress tracked to identify where additional teaching is needed. Classroom assistants are deployed well to support pupils whose achievement is faltering.

p.2

the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics

 National initiatives are drawing attention to the important aspects of teaching and learning, such as the development of pupils’ mathematical vocabulary and setting meaningful targets to help them improve. Training sessions have led to improvements in these areas.  There is good expertise in the teaching of mathematics in the school, particularly in identifying pupils’ misconceptions and using them to inform teaching. However, expertise is not shared sufficiently to benefit all teachers and all pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 improving pupils’ capacity to use and apply their knowledge and skills to raise achievement further  improving teachers’ subject knowledge to enable them to anticipate misconceptions and use them to enhance pupils’ understanding  checking pupils’ work in their books and evaluating how well teachers’ promote pupils’ mathematical understanding  sharing the good practice that already exists to benefit pupils and teachers in every part of the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As explained in our previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion