Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Sanderson
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 0
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- —
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- —
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Full report text
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with Paul Scott AI on 10 December 2008 to look at the impact of the National Strategies on raising standards and narrowing the attainment gap.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
As outlined in my initial letter, the visit focused on the work of the National Strategies in improving outcomes for children and young people. The visit focused particularly on the school’s view of the impact of the National Strategies and how this is evaluated.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual schools will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The evidence used to inform the outcomes of the visit included interviews with the headteacher, Strategy Manager, other senior staff, teachers and students. Three part-lessons were observed. Relevant documentation was scrutinised.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The leadership team report that relationships and communication with the local authority’s National Strategies team are very productive. They feel consultant support is very effective and that this has been an important factor in improving outcomes for students. They particularly identified the behaviour and attendance and mathematics strands of the strategy allied with good consultant support as having a positive impact on improvements in behaviour across the school and standards in mathematics. A large fall in the school’s exclusion rate provides evidence of the impact of behavioural strategies. The Secondary National Strategy is also identified as having played an important part in improving teaching and learning, particularly teachers’ use of assessment to support learning. Although the leadership team readily Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
06 February 2009 Mr Lewis Headteacher King Solomon High School Forest Road Barkingside Ilford Essex IG6 3HB acknowledge the positive impact of the strategy they also feel that other actions initiated by the school have had an impact on improving provision and outcomes for students. For example, internal processes of monitoring and quality assurance have been developed to be more systematic and rigorous and they feel this is ensuring a greater consistency of good practice across the school.
p.1
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
During this visit, the lessons observed and the conversations with students and teachers provided evidence that the National Strategy was having a positive impact on teaching and learning. Lessons are planned around learning objectives and these are routinely shared with students. When these objectives and success criteria are clearly explained and understood by students this focuses the lesson on learning and has a positive impact on their progress. However, this good practice is not yet consistently in place across the school. A range of strategies are also being used to actively engage students in learning. Effective questioning was used well in the lessons observed to check and develop learning. This aspect of teaching and learning has been a recent National Strategy focus within the school. In the lessons observed students behaved well and had good attitudes to learning. However, students report that although behaviour has improved some lessons are still
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
disrupted by low levels of student misbehaviour.
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
Analysis of the school’s test and examination results provides a generally positive but mixed picture as to the impact of the National Strategy on raising standards and narrowing the attainment gap. The percentage of Year 11 students attaining five or more A* to C grades including English and mathematics has been above average for the past three years and improved to be significantly above average in 2008. Standards particularly improved in mathematics and the school attributes this in large part to the impact of the National Strategy consultant support. However, standards in English have declined over the past two years and were at the national average in 2008.
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
The overall progress made by students between Year 7 and Year 11 as measured by contextual value added is high and student achievement in a number of subjects is at least good. However, the progress of students in English has not been so strong particularly for the most able. The progress made by students with learning difficulties and disabilities and those with English as an additional language is similar to all other students.
p.2
Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion