Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cathy Kirby

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Cathy Kirby

  • Postcode verified

    PE4 6JT

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%About the inspection 97%

Full report text

Mr D McPartlin Principal Ken Stimpson Community School Staniland Way Werrington Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE4 6JT

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with Jane Joyner HMI on 08 December 2008 to look at the impact of the National Strategies on raising standards and narrowing the attainment gap.

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

As outlined in my initial letter, the visit focused on the work of the National Strategies in improving outcomes for children and young people. The visit focused particularly on the school’s view of the impact of the National Strategies and how this is evaluated.

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual schools will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

The evidence used to inform the outcomes of the visit included interviews with the Principal, Deputy Principal, Assistant Principal, other senior staff, teachers and two groups of pupils. Inspectors observed four part-lessons and scrutinised relevant documentation.

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

Senior leaders consider that the National Strategies’ focus on improving teaching has raised the profile of teaching styles which actively engage students in learning and have led to a greater consistency in classroom practice across the school. However, they report and inspectors agree that it is difficult to disaggregate the effect of separate initiatives being implemented simultaneously. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@Ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk The visit provided evidence from lesson observations that teachers are planning activities which engage students in their learning, for example, practical work in science and opportunities to work and share ideas in pairs or small groups. Whilst senior leaders say that teaching overall has improved, practice is not consistent across the school: in two of the lessons observed behaviour was not managed well so the progress of too many students was

p.1

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

limited. Students say that the variability in the approach used by teachers to manage behaviour in lessons can be confusing. Only one lesson observed by inspectors made good use of assessment for learning and there were missed opportunities to develop students’ literacy skills.

p.2

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

The school has welcomed guidance from the National Strategies and the considerable number of consultant visits since January 2007. However, this support has yet to have an impact on the progress of students leaving at the end of Year 11 and is not reflected in an improved pattern of achievement during the period 2005 - 2008. Whilst standards rose in 2008, the overall progress made by 16 year olds relative to their attainment on entry to the school has declined since 2005, most notably in English. In 2007 students’ progress at the end of Key Stage 4 placed the school in the lowest 5% of all schools nationally. The provisional data for 2008 shows the same picture.

p.2

Ofsted survey programme visit - National Strategies survey 2008-09

More robust evaluation of the impact of interventions is necessary if the school is to sustain the improvement seen at the inspection in February 2008.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion