Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Jan 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bob Roberts

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bob Roberts

  • Postcode verified

    CH43 9EB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingvery wellgood progresssuccessfulconfidentlyrigorousprecise
Criticismat riskbelowpoorinconsistentnot sufficientlynot consistentlylackinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings765w−12
  • Leadership175w−43
  • What needs to improve121w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,033
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms P Roberts Headteacher Ridgeway High School Noctorum Avenue Prenton Merseyside CH43 9EB

p.1

and numeracy

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 12-13 November 2008 to look at work in literacy and numeracy.

p.1

and numeracy

As outlined in the initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of literacy and numeracy, my visit had a particular focus on how effectively the school is narrowing the gap for students at risk of not reaching the expected level of attainment for their age. The visit also evaluated the level of expertise within the school to support students with learning English as an additional language.

p.1

and numeracy

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

and numeracy

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with senior managers, students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of seven lessons as well as visits to other types of provision and activities.

p.1

and numeracy

The overall effectiveness in narrowing the gap for students at risk of not reaching the expected level of attainment for their age in literacy and numeracy was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement in literacy and numeracy is good. Standards are average. The achievement of students working below the expected level of attainment for their age is good.  A significant proportion of students enter the school with poor skills in literacy and numeracy.  The school’s assessment of students on entry is careful and precise.  A well-established and thorough programme of support is provided for students in Years 7 to 10. As a consequence, the school is successful in reducing the proportion of students who have a reading age below nine as they progress through Years 7 to 9.  Nevertheless, standards by the end of Key Stage 3 remain well below the national average.  In the 2008, the proportion of students achieving five or more passes at grades A* - C including English and mathematics in GCSE examinations, well below the national average for 2007.  The proportion of students achieving five or more passes at grades A*

p.1

Achievement and standards

to G was above the national average and is an important indicator of the good progress made by students overall.  The personal development of students is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of literacy and numeracy

The quality of teaching and learning for students working below the expected level of attainment for their age is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of literacy and numeracy

 Teacher support in literacy and numeracy is good. Teachers work well with students, encouraging and supporting them.  Teaching of literacy and numeracy skills across subjects is inconsistent and activities do not sufficiently challenge or engage all the students.  Most teachers confidently use information and communication technology (ICT). When students use ICT themselves their literacy skills are developed effectively.  Marking does not consistently support literacy and numeracy by showing students how to improve.  Students value the support they get in lessons.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum for students working below the expected level of attainment for their age is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 A significant number of students receive extra tuition in literacy and numeracy in Year 7. Some continue to receive extra support in Years 8 to 10.  The school provides an extensive programme of support as students approach tests and exams, from Years 9 to 11. There is a well established calendar of after school study sessions which include intensive evening and weekend residential opportunities.  New courses which support literacy and numeracy include a national ICT course. Adult literacy and numeracy qualifications are available for lower attaining students.  The ICT resources are a major element in supporting literacy and numeracy. The computer to pupil ratio is very good. Over 100 students in Key Stage 4 have been given a laptop with internet access to use at home.

p.2

Leadership and management of literacy and numeracy

The leadership and management of provision for students working below the expected level of attainment for their age are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of literacy and numeracy

 The school’s senior leadership team is the driving force behind the achievement of lower attaining students.  Senior leaders are responsible for the rigorous assessment and monitoring arrangements. They are closely involved with the intensive support provision that many students receive.  The roles of the literacy and numeracy coordinators lack clarity. Their guidance and advice is satisfactory but there is insufficient monitoring or sharing of best teaching in the school.

p.3

English as an additional language

The level of expertise within the school to support students with learning English as an additional language is satisfactory.

p.3

English as an additional language

 The English as an additional language coordinator has considerable experience and expertise.  Mainstream teachers have not received any training for English as an additional language, although guidance for teachers in planning to meet the needs of these learners is in place.  The current level of training, expertise and experience for teachers involved in English as an additional language is not sufficient.

p.3

Inclusion

Inclusion of students working below the expected levels of attainment for their age is outstanding.

p.3

Inclusion

 Ridgeway High is a very inclusive school. Students receive very good care, guidance and support.  Attendance is good and there are high levels of participation in the various support lessons and extra-curricular opportunities.  Assessment and monitoring arrangements are thorough and inclusive, enabling the welfare and progress of all students, particularly those who are vulnerable, to be very well met.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 review and clarify the roles of the literacy and numeracy coordinators to ensure they are more involved in monitoring how well literacy and numeracy are taught across subjects  share more widely the best examples of teaching literacy and numeracy across the curriculum  develop the expertise of teachers and staff in meeting the needs of students learning English as an additional language. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop literacy and numeracy in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion