Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    NW5 2JA

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectivestrongexcellentvery wellhappyconfident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
278
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs K Frood Headteacher Eleanor Palmer Primary School Lupton Street London NW5 2JA

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during our recent visit. We are particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time during the visit to meet us. Please pass on our thanks to all those concerned, including your students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. We noted, in particular:

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The school’s highly effective leadership has a strong commitment to community and social cohesion. Governors, parents and staff work in partnership to promote an inclusive learning environment.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The organisation of the curriculum develops pupils’ understanding of each other’s culture and faith or belief system very well.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Children are happy and confident, with high levels of self-esteem. They value the wide range of opportunities provided by the school that engenders a strong sense of community. Outcomes are excellent.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The school’s make-up of teaching staff does not currently reflect the gender and ethnicity profile of its community and the school plans to develop this over time.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, we will contact you first. We will notify you of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and provide you with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings. Yours sincerely

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion