Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fred Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Fred Brown

  • Postcode verified

    LS2 9BL

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
266
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Dr T Adlard Principal Notre Dame Catholic Sixth Form College St Marks Avenue Leeds LS2 9BL

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during our recent visit. We are particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work involved in preparing for the visit and for giving up your time to meet us. Please pass on our thanks to all those concerned, including your students.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The visit provided much useful evidence for the further development of community cohesion. We noted, in particular:

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The very strong student commitment to college values of respect, fairness, tolerance and support for those in need.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Good educational outcomes for all students with very few marked differences for particular groups.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Strong promotion of a wide range of volunteering opportunities for students to develop their social responsibility.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Particularly good initiatives to celebrate different faiths and cultures and to understand contemporary world issues.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 Good opportunities for young people to develop effective communication and advocacy skills.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

 The need for a more speedy focus on some more controversial contemporary issues such as knife crime.

p.1

Social Responsibility and Community Cohesion

The published survey report will list the names of the contributing institutions in an appendix. Should we wish to cite specific aspects of the good practice observed on this visit in the form of a detailed case study, we will contact you first. We will notify you of the date of publication of the survey report when it is confirmed and provide you with details of any other arrangements to disseminate the survey’s findings.

p.1

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion