Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 31 Dec 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Middleton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Middleton

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveenthusiasticmake good progressconfidentenjoyclearconsistently
Criticisminsufficientnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings828w+78
  • Leadership223w+17
  • What needs to improve87w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,105
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Mr G Metcalfe Acting Headteacher Abbots Langley School Parsonage Close Abbots Langley Hertfordshire WD5 OBQ

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Art and design

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 16 October 2008 to evaluate your work in art and design.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Art and design

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit also evaluated how effectively the school used the work of different, artists, craftworkers and designers to promote the pupils’ creativity.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Art and design

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Art and design

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: guided visit to all classrooms to discuss displays with individual teachers, analysis of additional work in the school portfolio, interviews with you, the subject leader and groups of pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, and observations of lessons in the Foundation Stage, Key Stage 1 and 2.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Art and design

The overall effectiveness of art and design was judged good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils make good progress in art and design. The work on display, in the school portfolio and in lessons indicates that pupils achieve good standards in a range of art media during their time at the school.  Particularly creative work is achieved when the children respond to opportunities to work on a large scale. For example, brush, roller and splatter paintings created in the nursery and free weavings by Year 3 Alexandra House 33 Kingsway T 08456 404045 London F 020 7421 6855 WC2B 6SE www.ofsted.gov.uk pupils through found structures such as bed springs, are confident. There is less evidence of these qualities in the work of Years 5 and 6.  The quality of pupils’ mark-making in a range of two-dimensional and digital media is good in all years. Work is particularly effective when pupils apply their mark-making skills to direct observation. For example the intricate interpretations of leaves created in Year 4.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils enjoy using colour from the start. They are able to make colours thoughtfully in Reception by building on their exploration of colour in the nursery. In Key Stage 1 pupils mix and match colour well to make self-portraits and in Key Stage 2 use colour symbolism to add impact, for example to their work linked to RE, inspired by stained glass.  Pupils show good awareness about how to use the stimulus of other artists to develop their own use of materials, including digital media. For example, their interpretation of Wassily Kandinsky in Year 2, John Brunsdon in Year 4 and Friedensreich Hundertwasser in Year 5.  Collaboration is handled effectively by the pupils, particularly when working on group projects, comparing ideas or evaluating the work of other artists. Pupils are reflective about the subject, evident in discussion about the distinction between the work of artists, designers and craftspeople and the role and purpose of sketchbooks.

p.2

Achievement and standards

 The independence of pupils is impressive in selecting and managing tools and equipment. In Key Stage 1 these qualities are also apparent in the ‘learning logs’ in which pupils work with their parents to record relevant experiences enjoyed outside school. Sketchbooks have not yet achieved their potential in promoting pupils’ research skills throughout.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in art and design

Teaching and learning in art and design are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in art and design

 Teachers are enthusiastic about art and design lessons. They are used to evaluating their work together through a regular cycle of displays. During the visit, teachers in all years shared examples of pupils’ work, were well informed about the purpose and took pride in achievements.  A good sequence of activities ensures that the pace of lessons remains brisk. Teachers use their generic teaching skills well to stimulate pupils’ interest, through the use of digital technology, challenging questioning, and progress reviews with pupils focused on objectives achieved.  Support staff make an effective contribution to pupils’ learning in art and design through systematic organisation of resources, materials and equipment, attractive displays that present pupils’ work sympathetically and well judged support for pupils in need of additional help.  Teachers model creativity effectively for the pupils through

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in art and design

demonstration or by developing unusual ideas for creative activities. For example, in Reception the children were invited to paint outside a picture of the autumn trees, with different mixtures of mud.  Nevertheless, in some classrooms the remains of a ‘template’ culture contrasts starkly with pupils’ diverse responses to more open-ended opportunities.  Adults circulate effectively in the classroom to provide constructive advice to pupils about how to move their work on. The assessment scheme enables staff to track pupils’ progress in relation to different strands of the attainment target.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The curriculum in art and design is good.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum

 The art and design curriculum is integrated effectively with other subjects while retaining a clear focus on subject specific objectives. Information and communication technology (ICT) is used consistently well in the context of art and design.  Several topics make the art and design curriculum relevant to the pupils by linking topics to their direct experiences. For example, work inspired by the architecture and grounds of the school or local landmarks such as St Albans Cathedral.  The long term curriculum overview of the subject provides a clear framework for progression. However, the responses of the most able artists indicate unrealised opportunities to personalise the curriculum in order to accelerate progress and deepen their knowledge and skills.  The schemes of work enable pupils to encounter a wide range of art, craft and design from different times and places. Gallery visits and artists in residence are used strategically to enrich particular units of

p.3

Quality of the curriculum

work.  Teachers are committed to the new scheme of work being used but know that the best teaching is likely to involve their personal stake in its success. This is also evident in the continuation of favourite projects from previous schemes that teachers have continued successfully.

p.3

Leadership and management of art and design

The leadership and management of art and design are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of art and design

 The subject leader is enthusiastic and active about promoting links with other subjects including design and technology, her other area of responsibility.  Subject specific self-evaluation is used effectively to identify successes to build on and priorities for improvement. The subject action plan provides a secure basis for continued development.  Staff are fully involved in reviewing the subject through collaborative planning and presentations about their displays. However, there is currently no systematic observation of lessons by the subject leader.  The different units of work are resourced efficiently. Risk assessment is thorough.  A portfolio of work from all years contributes to moderation of standards achieved by different classes. Nevertheless, there is insufficient use of examples which distinguish between different levels of ability by individual pupils in response to a shared starting point.

p.3

Subject issue: How effectively the work of other artists,

craftworkers and designers is used to promote the pupils’ creativity.

p.3

Subject issue: How effectively the work of other artists,

This is good.  Teachers actively encourage pupils to express and exchange views about the work of other artists.  Pupils often use media unlike that used by the artist whose work is studied. Nevertheless, they are able to identify other connections.  The good work in the early years could be further enhanced by introducing pupils to the work of other artists when reviewing their creative achievements.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

 increase opportunities for the most able young artists to pursue work  develop the use of sketchbooks  track pupils’ creative development as part of assessment in the subject.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop art and design across the school.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion