Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joyce Deere

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joyce Deere

  • Postcode verified

    UB8 1NQ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings27w0
  • What needs to improve60w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
87
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms L Smith Uxbridge College Park Road Uxbridge Middlesex UB8 1NQ

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff during our visit on 03 October 2008 to look at success factors in promoting equality and improving the outcomes for learners from black and minority ethnic backgrounds.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: meetings with staff, meetings with learners, observation of teaching and learning, scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The quality of provision to promote equalities is outstanding .

p.1

Features of good practice and success factors observed

 The very high expectations that staff have for all students, thus promoting an ethos of success.  Very high success rates for all students, including students from Black and minority ethnic backgrounds. The college average success rates are high at around 82% for all learners, and the college has taken steps to improve the outcomes for Black Caribbean learners, which were less good than those of other groups.  Strong promotion, through policy implementation, of a culture where diversity is valued and seen as a strength and resource. The different backgrounds of learners are valued and respected, and action is taken to respond to their cultural requests, such as a place to pray.  The detailed and thorough monitoring of a wide range of indicators by senior managers which has led to successful outcomes for all learners.  The challenging and self-critical approach to equality and diversity issues through the work of the equality and diversity forum and the student

p.1

Features of good practice and success factors observed

equality and diversity special interest group, which identifies areas for improvement and takes action.  The code of conduct for students and staff with a strong focus on equality, diversity and respect for individuals.  The wide range of events celebrating cultural diversity in meaningful ways.  The wide range of contexts for learning and progression routes from the community, with a particular focus on the development of ESOL support in vocational courses at level one.  Effective use of technology to enable learners to widen their knowledge and to improve communication.

p.2

Areas for development

None observed during the course of the visit.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop promoting equalities in Uxbridge College.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local LSC and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion