Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David McMahon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David McMahon

  • Postcode verified

    YO32 4BZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclear
Criticisminconsistencymissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve87w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
120
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 86%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

09 October 2008 Mrs M E Wright Headteacher Joseph Rowntree School Haxby Road New Earswick York YO32 4BZ

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff at Joseph Rowntree School, during my visit on the 09 October 2008 to look at work in promoting equality.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, interview with staff and a governor, telephone interviews with parents, scrutiny of relevant documentation, and observations of four lessons or parts of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted subject survey: good practice in promoting equality

The quality of provision to promote equalities is outstanding.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The excellent support for pupils may be vulnerable is demonstrated primarily through its whole school approach to individual care. There are specific interventions which have positive effects on groups of pupils, such as named teachers for gypsy, Roma and traveller students to go to if they have difficulties. The school’s variety of approaches and care to ensure that these interventions are well matched to individuals have led to improved outcomes for all its students, which have recently moved to significantly above average.  The school uses data well to provide focus for individual students when they are in danger of falling behind. Student targets are bench marked against expected outcomes, are regularly reviewed, and students, including those who require extra help, know what is of expected of them. This enables prompt and positive help to be provided where necessary.  Joseph Rowntree is a calm, orderly community where learning is celebrated.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

Negative incidents are rare, and when they do happen are dealt with quickly, firmly and within the ethos of a school that is inclusive. The school is “intolerant of intolerance” and as a result students consistently comment on how secure they feel. All staff are vigilant in ensuring this remains so. For example, one student stated “I’ve been discriminated against as a traveller by other children…now teachers hear of it and sort it out so quickly.” A parent of a child with a medical syndrome commented that a bullying incident “was dealt with that day and never repeated.”  Relationships generally are excellent which ensures that all students regardless of need, can confidently access their education. Pupils’ emotional needs are well met through, for example, an active peer mentoring programme, regular school nurse visits, and a school counsellor. This benefits all the students involved and contributes to a very positive ethos. “Being a

p.2

Features of good practice observed

peer mentor is really rewarding. Everyone wants to help the younger children along. And you don’t have to go straight to a teacher.” The sixth form has a commendable volunteering scheme structured into the timetable where students are expected to develop themselves through community work, either in school, for example by paired reading or assisting in lessons lower down the school, or working in other community provision.  The school is strongly focussed on students as individuals, which means that all students have fair access to the many positive experiences that Joseph Rowntree School has to offer. There is a wide range of activities available, which can be tailored to encourage those who might otherwise opt out. For example, a trampolining course has encouraged the continued participation of girls who were disaffected from conventional games.  There is inspirational teaching at Joseph Rowntree School, which benefits all

p.2

Features of good practice observed

the students who experience it and is particularly effective in ensuring that students with additional needs are fully engaged in stimulating, focussed, well planned activities. This ensures that all students make good progress.  Teachers demonstrate a good understanding of students’ specific needs. For example, teachers of students with cochlear implants demonstrate appropriate knowledge and provide work that is well matched to the needs of learners.  The school keeps the curriculum under constant review. There are good links with feeder primary schools which means there is continuity when pupils transfer to secondary. The school operates four pathways plus a college option for Key Stage 4 pupils which meet the varied needs of students. The school offers extra sessions for pupils outside the regular timetable to ensure they stay on target. Students, including those from vulnerable groups such as students with English as an additional language are enthusiastic about the

p.2

Features of good practice observed

wide range of extracurricular activities that are available.

p.2

Areas for development

 There is some inconsistency in marking and as a result there are sometimes missed opportunities to provide pupils who have additional needs with effective feedback and clear written explanations of how to improve.

p.3

Areas for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop promoting equalities in Joseph Rowntree School.

p.3

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion