Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patricia Pothecary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patricia Pothecary

  • Postcode verified

    CV4 9PB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallypositive
Criticismexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
339
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr M Chilvers Headteacher Woodfield School Hawthorne Lane Coventry CV4 9PB

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

Thank you for meeting with me at your school on Tuesday 7 October 2008 so that I could hear about the work of your school in relation to the extent and quality of provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion. My judgements are related to the arrangements and outcomes for pupils whose exclusions meant you had to provide education for them from day 6 of their exclusions.

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

Although you have not excluded any pupils this academic year for more than five days the meeting was very useful because it enabled me to discuss and meet with a pupil who was excluded last term. This demonstrated that provision is suitable, meets requirements and has had a positive effect. You also articulated what the school has done to reduce the need to exclude pupils on a fixed-term basis for more than five days. These things included:

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

 the development of four special units to support pupils whose behaviour is exceptionally challenging  the use of mentors to liaise with all agencies and support the most vulnerable pupils.

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

In addition you discussed then need to strengthen the communication regarding then nature of the day 6 provision in meeting the very particular needs of Woodfield pupils.

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

The visit will provide much useful evidence for our survey.

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

Woodfield School will not be named in any publication without your permission. Most evidence will be used at a general level to ascertain if schools and local authorities are complying with legislation and to identify the quality and extent of their provision. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@Ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Thank you once again for your co-operation to help me gain an insight into the work of your school.

p.1

provision for pupils from day 6 of exclusion

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion