Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Mar 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Francis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Francis

  • Postcode verified

    CB4 1RW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

The Headteacher Shirley Community Nursery and Primary School Green End Road Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB4 1RW

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 4 February 2009, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. Please thank those staff and governors who gave their time to talk with me. I would also like to thank the children at the school for being so friendly and welcoming and talking with me about their work.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

As a result of the inspection on 4 – 5 March 2008, the school was asked to:  Raise standards in English, mathematics and science at Key Stages 1 and 2.  Improve the attendance of pupils.  Improve the provision for the potentially higher attainers.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Good progress has been made in enhancing the provision for the higher attaining pupils, especially in the upper part of the school. For example, the mathematics withdrawal group of Year 6 pupils provides good opportunities for developing high level thinking and recording skills, including the use of some advanced technical vocabulary. It is too soon to evaluate the impact of this on standards and achievement but discussions with pupils indicate that they are well motivated by these additional opportunities. Cambridge Education Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01223 578500 Direct F 01223 578501 risp.inspections@camb-ed.com Page 2 The most recent test results showed standards in reading, writing and mathematics were well below average at Year 2, and exceptionally low at Year 6, where attainment in English was particularly weak. Detailed analysis of whole school data

p.1

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

by the leadership and a thorough analysis of the test papers by subject leaders have enabled the school to make adjustments to the curriculum and increase the level of support through a good range of intervention strategies. However, on current evidence, the school is unlikely to achieve its Year 6 targets for the 2009 national tests. Writing remains the weakest area of English and pupils have many gaps in their understanding of, for example, punctuation skills and common spelling rules. Not all teachers have the secure awareness of age-related expectations that would allow them to target these errors and prevent those becoming barriers to future learning. However, the presentation of pupils’ work is good; with most pupils using a flowing joined script for their writing. The local authority has produced a detailed plan for the school and provided a range of valuable support through consultants and advisers aimed at raising standards. The impact of this is subject to regular

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Revised systems are making the analysis of standards and progress more detailed and informative. These changes are also giving pupils a much clearer view of their own level of success. The school has devised a list of ‘non-negotiable’ expectations for each year group; for example, in writing, which give a sharper focus on age related expectations. However, the school is less effective in making direct comparisons for the progress of different groups of pupils in relation to their national averages. Closing the gap between the school’s performance for these different groups of pupils and national averages will be vital in raising achievement. While the school’s most recent assessment shows an overall improvement in the rate of pupils’ progress, this will need to be accelerated even further to significantly reduce the current gap between the school and national expectations.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

Attendance figures for last term show an improvement over the previous year. Much of this is due to an effective reward system, popular with the pupils, and the work of the school’s attendance officer. The school is rigorous in tackling persistent absentees, but it lacks a range of strategies to address the frequent, casual absences. While all parents are provided with information about their child’s attendance, this should be given a sharper focus to make the link between good attendance and pupils’ progress more explicit.

p.2

Ofsted monitoring of Grade 3 schools

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion