Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
David Anstead
- Postcode verified
WS13 8AY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes10
“Higher attaining pupils are insufficiently challenged and underachieve.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 859
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs S Gaffiney Headteacher Christ Church CofE (C) Primary School Christ Church Lane Lichfield Staffordshire WS13 8AY
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 07 October to look at work in ICT.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the quality of assessment.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.
p.1
Communication Technology (ICT)
The overall effectiveness of ICT was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards in ICT
Achievement is satisfactory and standards are average.
p.1
Achievement and standards in ICT
Attainment on entry in ICT is evaluated from pupils’ performance against the early learning goals and is broadly average. Standards overall remain average as pupils move up through the school indicating satisfactory achievement. Pupils with learning difficulties and/ or disabilities make satisfactory progress due to the effective support they receive from teaching assistants. Higher attaining pupils are insufficiently challenged and underachieve. Most pupils are aware of the need to keep themselves safe when online and are able to explain how to do so.
p.1
Quality of teaching and learning of ICT
ICT was used effectively to improve learning in other subjects. In a mathematics lesson pupils’ understanding of multiplication was reinforced by providing them with laptops and software designed to test and motivate them. In a history lesson a computer simulation was used well to enable pupils to experience what sending a telegram was like back in the 1950s compared to modern day ‘texting’. Teachers use interactive whiteboards confidently to explain the lesson and are competent users of ICT themselves. Overall expectations of pupils are too low and there is a lack of challenging work for higher attaining pupils in particular. This is partly explained by the absence of assessment information until very recently which means that planning does not address the full range of different starting points of pupils.
p.2
Quality of the curriculum for ICT
The topics planned for pupils ensure all aspects of the National Curriculum for ICT are adequately covered. There are satisfactory opportunities for example for pupils to record and edit digital video, to use data logging devices in science and to learn how to program using the ‘logo’ computer language. Satisfactory provision for teaching pupils about keeping themselves safe when online has recently been introduced. There is insufficient challenge in the work planned for pupils from year to year, especially for the more able.
p.2
Leadership and management of ICT
Leadership and management are satisfactory.
p.2
Leadership and management of ICT
The school uses a national model for evaluating ICT provision. The most important strengths and weaknesses have been identified and the school is beginning to remedy some major deficiencies. A new assessment and tracking system has been introduced, there has been significant investment in laptops so that ICT is available in classrooms and renewed curriculum planning has taken place which integrates the use of ICT into a topic based approach. Monitoring of the quality of provision by senior leaders is not systematic and is insufficiently rigorous. Whilst monitoring has assured the school that the National Curriculum programme of study for ICT is covered, insufficient attention is paid to evaluating the quality of teaching and learning and the degree of challenge provided to pupils. Management of resources is satisfactory. The school follows national guidance in making decisions about ICT investments and ensures
p.2
Use of Assessment
The use of assessment is now satisfactory.
p.3
Use of Assessment
A new tracking system was introduced very recently which enables the school to monitor the progress of individual pupils on all aspects of the National Curriculum for ICT. It is too soon for information from this system to have had an impact on the quality of planning or on achievement. Prior to this, although teachers did grade individual pupils’ work in ICT against National Curriculum levels, these grades were not collated and trends in attainment were not analysed. Consequently standards in ICT in comparison to national averages have not been monitored. The school is unable to say how well its pupils are doing and whether outcomes in ICT are good enough or not. Targets are not set for ICT. Most pupils spoken to were unclear about how well they were doing or what they needed to do to improve their work.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
using assessment information to plan challenging work and particularly so for higher attaining pupils ensuring pupils have guidance on how to improve their work monitoring the quality of teaching and learning and overall achievement.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion