Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Nov 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bradley Simmons

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bradley Simmons

  • Postcode verified

    SN12 8HY

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellenteffectivelyhigh expectationsgood progresshigh qualityimprovingconsistent
Criticismnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • Leadership979w+86
  • What needs to improve133w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,116
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%Leadership 86%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs D Wiltshire Headteacher Churchfields, The Village School Bradford Road Atworth Wiltshire SN12 8HY

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, pupils, parents and governors, during my visit on 01 October 2008 to evaluate the impact of new models of leadership on school improvement.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included discussions with governors, staff, pupils, parents, a scrutiny of relevant documentation and a lesson observation.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

The overall effectiveness of the model of leadership, a federation of two primary schools, is outstanding.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

The impact of the model of leadership on achievement and standards is outstanding.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

 Good teaching and high expectations ensure that pupils make at least good progress. Since federation, overall standards across the new school have risen year on year. Unvalidated results for Year 6 pupils demonstrate that, in 2008, the overall performance of boys and girls was well above that expected nationally.  The school’s focus on improving pupils’ writing paid off in 2008. All Year 6 pupils attained the nationally expected Level 4, although fewer higher ability pupils attained the highest level in writing than might be expected.  When one of the predecessor schools was last inspected in 2004, standards had been unsatisfactory. The impact of the federation has been such that, in March 2008, the school’s first full inspection report post federation noted that achievement and standards were good.  Senior leaders have created outstanding links for pupils across the two sites.

p.1

leadership: influences and outcomes

The impact of the model of leadership on the quality of teaching and learning is outstanding.

p.2

leadership: influences and outcomes

 Parents and pupils expressed their view that teaching across both sites has become more consistent since federation. One Year 6 pupil noted that teaching is better because ‘there are more teachers now and they bounce ideas off each other’. Other pupils agreed. Joint planning across both sites is improving the consistency and quality of teaching.  Older pupils are benefiting from some specialist teaching one day each week. Teachers are enjoying the opportunity to teach single cohorts for short periods.  Target setting for pupils is well developed across the federation. Teachers set and review formal curricular targets with pupils each term, so pupils know what they need to do to improve.  You and your base leaders monitor rigorously the quality of teaching and learning. Teachers receive high quality written feedback, which includes pertinent comments regarding subject knowledge as well as addressing generic teaching skills.

p.2

leadership: influences and outcomes

The impact of the model of leadership on the quality of the curriculum is good.

p.2

leadership: influences and outcomes

 The school is developing a thematic curriculum, with discrete subject teaching where necessary. All teachers note that the combination of the creativity and expertise from both staffs has enhanced this work.  There is a clear curriculum map which is used to ensure that pupils do not repeat themes at the same skills level. Opportunities for learning outdoors, for example on day and residential trips are not yet tied into this planning.  Both predecessor schools had satisfactory curricula when last inspected. A mark of the impact of the federation is that the curriculum was graded good at the time of the new school’s first full inspection in March 2008.  The base leader on the Monkton Farleigh site has undertaken an outstanding piece of work to ensure that the different phases of the school’s chosen scheme to teach systematic phonics are sensibly aligned to enable coherent teaching across different ability groups.

p.2

leadership: influences and outcomes

 A range of extra-curricular clubs are enjoyed by pupils at both sites. All Year 6 pupils were looking forward to attending homework club on the day of the inspection. The club provides a further valuable opportunity for this cohort to be taught as a single year group.  Parents are not fully aware of the work the school is doing to develop the curriculum and enrich children’s learning experiences.

p.3

leadership: influences and outcomes

The impact of the model of leadership on the quality of leadership and management throughout the school is outstanding.

p.3

leadership: influences and outcomes

 A judiciously considered leadership structure at Churchfields ensures that a minimum of one senior manager is available as a contact point for parents on both sites. Sensibly, the two base leaders carry responsibility for English and mathematics respectively across the school. All subject leaders manage fewer subjects than was the case before federation, and their responsibilities cover both sites. Pupils therefore experience a commonality of curriculum and approach on both sites.  Senior leaders have developed excellent systems to track pupils’ progress, although cohort targets for reading, writing and mathematics are not yet reflected in some targets found in the school improvement plan.  Named governors track the progress of individual cohorts of children. Governors are assiduous in completing records of their cohort visits, but discussion and challenge regarding pupils’ progress are not apparent within the minutes of governors meetings.

p.3

leadership: influences and outcomes

 A mark of the success of your work in driving the ongoing development of this federation is reflected in the comment of one parent who was originally opposed to it. She noted that she is ‘amazed that the federation has gone so well’.  The amount of curriculum time that pupils spend travelling between sites has been minimised whilst maximising the opportunities for children of both sites to work together.

p.3

leadership: influences and outcomes

The impact of the model of leadership on inclusion is good.

p.3

leadership: influences and outcomes

 Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities are making good and often outstanding progress.  Senior leaders and staff target support effectively to combat underachievement.  Parents on both sites are pleased that their children can still walk or be accompanied to their village school, and feel part of their villages.

p.3

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

 continue work in progress to improve the attainment of higher ability pupils in writing  ensure that the purpose of opportunities for outdoor learning are explicit in planning and well used as a resource for wider learning  provide regular brief curriculum updates for parents so they can support their children’s learning at home more effectively  ensure that improvement planning reflects annual targets for improvement for each cohort so that governors are able to hold the school more effectively to account.

p.4

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope these observations are useful to you as you continue to develop the school.

p.4

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be made available to the team who conduct your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion