Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 27 Apr 2009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 4
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −22Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Praisevery effectivetimelyimprovingeffectivelystrengthclearlyeffectiveindependent
    Criticismlimitedinsufficientat riskbelowdeclinedinsufficientlyslowincomplete

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    4
    Words of findings
    1,262
    about usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 36, typical 45
    Average sentence
    18 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    10%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    Context

    This monitoring visit follows the inspection in January 2008 at which Omega Training Service’s overall effectiveness, leadership and management, equality of opportunity and capacity to improve were judged to be satisfactory. The provision in health, public services and care, and preparation for life and work, were also judged to be satisfactory. Omega Training Services Limited (Omega) was established in 1996 and provides work-based learning for the care sector, specialising in the care of the elderly in the West Midlands. The senior management team consists of two directors. Omega employs 15 staff including the two directors.

    p.1

    Context

    Omega contracts with Birmingham & Solihull Learning and Skills Council (LSC). It has increased the range of its provision in the last year. The company offers apprenticeships and National Vocational Qualifications (NVQ) at levels 2, 3 and 4 through Train to Gain programmes. Skills for Life qualifications are also offered through Train to Gain. Omega offers NVQs in health and social care, business and administration, retail skills and children’s services learning and development. At the time of the monitoring visit there were eight learners on advanced apprenticeships and 21 on apprenticeships. On Train to Gain programmes, 169 learners are working towards NVQs at level 2, 77 at level 3, two at level 4 and 50 are on Skills for Life programmes. Omega also offers assessor training on a commercial basis. The company currently works with 45 employers and all learners are employed.

    p.1

    progress

    Omega has made insufficient progress in improving success rates. At the time of the previous inspection, the overall success rate for all apprenticeships was 67%, some eight per cent above the national average. Since then the overall success rate has fallen and at 63% it is now in line with, but not above, the national average. At the time of the previous inspection, the overall success rate for advanced apprentices was 41%, 15% below the national average. For 2007/08 the success rate has increased substantially to 60%, only three per cent below the national average. However, progress in improving timely success rates has been slow. Since the previous inspection the timely success rate has only increased by a further two per cent and is 19% below the national average.

    p.1

    progress

    At the time of the previous inspection the overall success rate for apprentices was high at 83%, significantly above the national average. In 2007/08 the overall success rate declined to 64%, in line with the national average. The timely success rate for apprentices has fallen by 10% to 62%, but remains above the national average.

    p.2

    progress

    Omega has made significant progress in promoting independent learning. At the time of the previous inspection Omega staff did not promote independent learning actively enough as part of the Train to Gain programme for health and social care. Access to resources was limited, learners made little use of information communication technology and few attended off-the-job training workshops.

    p.2

    progress

    Since then Omega has invested in a very effective e-portfolio system for some of its NVQ and apprenticeship programmes. The package enables speedy and flexible communication between learners and assessors on practical issues and more regular assessment and feedback on progress. Learners regularly complete assignments at home or independently in the workplace. Internet-enabled laptops are available for learners to use for research if their workplace does not have adequate resources. Learners on health and social care programmes access an internet-based resource to increase their background knowledge for their NVQ. Learners gain valuable incidental skills in using computers and in managing their own learning. Attendance at a range of weekly workshops for first aid, manual handling, equality and diversity, are now satisfactory.

    p.2

    progress

    During the previous inspection Omega made insufficient use of management information to measure learners’ progress and the performance of the different programmes. Omega collected data through the assessors’ feedback, but data on learners’ progress was not collated or analysed centrally. Managers did not have an accurate assessment of learners’ progress and were unable to obtain overall information on learners’ performance to inform their decisions about quality improvement . Omega has made significant progress with this area. A comprehensive system which managers use effectively to monitor learners’ progress throughout their programme is now in place. All assessors have access to the management information on a daily basis. A manager is responsible for overseeing and maintaining the data and taking actions to ensure learners at risk of not achieving are identified and supported.

    p.2

    maintained

    At the time of the previous inspection learners following programmes for literacy, numeracy and key skills were progressing well towards qualifications at different levels and were demonstrating good work related skills. Omega has maintained this strength. Achievement rates are still high and most learners work on qualifications for both literacy and numeracy at level 1 or level 2, however, relatively few progress to a higher level, as was identified in the previous inspection report.

    p.3

    maintained

    Omega encourages all of its learners to aspire to progress onto higher levels. The company gives advice and guidance to employers and employees on identifying individual and organisational needs. It makes the most of changes to Train to Gain funding to take learners through NVQs at levels 2 and 3 and, ultimately to progress to further and higher education.

    p.3

    progress

    At the previous inspection, Omega’s arrangements for quality improvement were incomplete. The company did not have a quality policy and procedures manual. Omega has made reasonable progress in developing new systems. Most key policy statements are now in place and Omega’s operational manager has compiled a file of documents plus a calendar of reviews and quality checks. Within the team of managers and administrators there is a clearer focus on roles related to quality assurance, with internal audit activity taking place regularly.

    p.3

    progress

    Omega has devised new systems for assessment and monitoring of learners’ progress and achievement. Changes to the system for reviews have made it easier to identify when learners are struggling with an aspect of their programme and to provide additional support more quickly. The company has invested in a new management information system that makes it easier to monitor learners’ progress and identify any difficulties. Omega collects the views of learners and employers at key points in their programme. It uses the data from these evaluations to focus on change and improvement.

    p.3

    progress

    Omega has increased the range of its provision significantly in the last year, but has taken care to ensure that quality standards are maintained, making the most of staff expertise, advice from external verifiers and consultancy support. that the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk). Omega identified a problem with the observation of teaching, training and learning. In the year since the previous inspection, it stopped using formal, graded observation, relying instead on shadowing of new staff and internal verification checks on assessment practice. The company has commissioned training and consultancy on a new system to be implemented in April 2009.

    p.3

    progress

    All staff were involved in drawing up the post inspection action plan. The plan is clearly linked to outcomes of the previous inspection and the areas for improvement identified in the self-assessment report. It is comprehensive and effective with a good focus on continuous quality improvement. The plan contains specific and measurable actions that are clearly allocated to different members of staff to implement. Omega has made at least reasonable progress on most areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection.

    p.4

    progress

    Omega’s self-assessment is inclusive and uses learners and employers feedback well. However, the report is insufficiently evaluative and its use of data is limited.

    p.4

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion