Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Dec 2008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Ryan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Ryan

  • Postcode verified

    B45 9NY

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+43Positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve72w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
105
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 78%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404040 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr P Jones Headteacher Colmers School and Sports College Bristol Road South, Rednal Birmingham West Midlands B45 9NY

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 30 September 2008 to look at work on capturing the user voice.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey: good practice in capturing the user voice

The evidence used to inform the judgements made, included observation of lessons, meetings with staff and students and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice observed

 The school’s strong overarching vision on student voice and engagement is firmly embedded within the two key aims of the school: ‘better teaching, better learning’. Leaders involve students well in the school’s ongoing evaluation of its practice.  The school offers many opportunities for students to follow their wishes and interests both within the curriculum and the enrichment programmes.  Well structured and integrated leadership and learning programmes support students in developing their self-esteem, confidence and strategies for learning. These programmes impact positively on students’ educational achievement and personal development.  As a result students’ confidence to voice their views and opinions grows during their time at the school; they develop leadership skills and take responsibility for their own actions, their school and the wider community. They are involved routinely in the planning and evaluation of initiatives and activities within and

p.1

Features of good practice observed

beyond the school.  The impact of the student voice is high, for example changes to the school environment, the development of student learning journal and advice and guidance on anti-bullying strategies.  The school council’s well-managed democratic structure supports students in making their voice heard and is developing its role in helping to influence strategic decision-making.  The school’s strong inclusive ethos is built on very good knowledge of individual students’ needs, supported by detailed educational and attitudinal data. Those identified as most at risk are well supported by an integrated multi-disciplinary team, which provides specialist targeted support for more vulnerable students.  Very effective use is made of external links to enhance provision and experiences for students, for example work with primary schools, colleges and national organisations as well as with Birmingham and the Edge consortium which provide

p.1

Features of good practice observed

wider opportunities for students to participate in decision-making.

p.2

Area for development

 Building on existing strong practice, seek opportunities to formalise the involvement of students in strategic planning and evaluation.

p.2

Area for development

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the user voice in the centre.

p.2

Area for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion